He’s probably staying for 2, as he should....
Unless he kills it even further for the rest of the year. That means in all aspects.
Unless he kills it even further for the rest of the year. That means in all aspects.
Yeah. He's having a fantastic start to the season, but it's not like he's Jack Eichel out there where he's just making other guys look foolish and completely dominating. He can still gain a lot from another year down there, the strength training, playing against guys that are more mature but not yet at the AHL level, etc.
He’s probably staying for 2, as he should....
... For Miller- he's got more to learn there than just scoring. He's in a good system to build his fundamentals as a hockey player before going pro.
I watched the entire game posted above and that was one of the most non-de script 4 point games I have seen. I am not saying he wasn't good but it wasn't a 4 point game of a guy dominating college hockey. He made some good plays showed some skill but there were also plays where he was standing still and a goal was scored. So I think he still needs some work to do on his over all game. My guess is at least 1 more year.
Jesus, I guess this is a first world problem. We're now complaining about nondescript 4 point games from our college freshman defensive prospects.
I think a good dose of reality from someone who viewed the whole game is not a bad thing. It was said in the context of a discussion on how long Miller should stay in school and it is appropriate to note that it wasn’t in Hughes (or Eichel) dominant way.
Which is exactly why I'd let him cook in the NCAA for at least one more season after this one. It's great that he's putting up the numbers that he is, don't get me wrong. The Rangers front office and coaches should be telling him to focus on the finer nuances of his defensive game in the second half of this year and sophomore season. The points will come if he continues to play smart hockey.I got to see a couple Eichel games in the NCAA and it was just really entertaining. Reminded me of when Paul Kariya played for UMaine back in the day. Just schooling entire teams.
For Miller- he's got more to learn there than just scoring. He's in a good system to build his fundamentals as a hockey player before going pro.
Which is exactly why I'd let him cook in the NCAA for at least one more season after this one. It's great that he's putting up the numbers that he is, don't get me wrong. The Rangers front office and coaches should be telling him to focus on the finer nuances of his defensive game in the second half of this year and sophomore season. The points will come if he continues to play smart hockey.
I didn't think he was complaining. I thought it was a valid point. He's gotta become a great defenseman, not just a guy who stands still and ends up the lucky beneficiary of a weak secondary assist.Jesus, I guess this is a first world problem. We're now complaining about nondescript 4 point games from our college freshman defensive prospects.
I know, I was half being facetious.
I just hope that he doesn't put up like 35 points this season and then "only" record 28 next season, leading people to think he regressed. It can be difficult, even for forwards, to put up continually escalating point totals in the NCAA. And that's because of graduations and guys leaving early, which can rather dramatically alter the talent level on a team. Like you can be a 40-point wing as a Sophomore and then your top C and LW graduate and suddenly you're a Junior playing with a less-talented Sophomore C and Freshman LW, and you put up 30 points. You didn't get worse, the team just changed. Happens all the time in NCAA hockey. So...just trying to prepare people, if that starts to happen a year from now.![]()
Less points = bust.
K'Andre the Giant
Fewer points...
Your wrong.
Careful there @Webster might think your referring to his guy Zucc instead of the god Zeus..I didn't think he was complaining. I thought it was a valid point. He's gotta become a great defenseman, not just a guy who stands still and ends up the lucky beneficiary of a weak secondary assist.
He's clearly NOT just that. But that doesnt mean he doesnt still have a ton to work on
****ing goddammit. (Pulls old, dusty tomb off book shelf) fa...fac... face...facete... facilitate...nope too far.
Goddamit Webster this is why zeus invented the internet
Apparently facete, a random thing I typed actually IS an archaic stand in for facetious. Not going to pretend I knew that at all bc I didnt. Insane coincidence
Jesus, I guess this is a first world problem. We're now complaining about nondescript 4 point games from our college freshman defensive prospects.
I think a good dose of reality from someone who viewed the whole game is not a bad thing. It was said in the context of a discussion on how long Miller should stay in school and it is appropriate to note that it wasn’t in Hughes (or Eichel) dominant way.
I know, I was half being facetious.
I didn't think he was complaining. I thought it was a valid point. He's gotta become a great defenseman, not just a guy who stands still and ends up the lucky beneficiary of a weak secondary assist.
He's clearly NOT just that. But that doesnt mean he doesnt still have a ton to work on
****ing goddammit. (Pulls old, dusty tomb off book shelf) fa...fac... face...facete... facilitate...nope too far.
Goddamit Webster this is why zeus invented the internet
Apparently facete, a random thing I typed actually IS an archaic stand in for facetious. Not going to pretend I knew that at all bc I didnt. Insane coincidence
This and K'Iller are fantastic nicknames.K'Andre the Giant
He's speaking AustralianFewer points...
He's speaking Australian