1) Defensemen are notoriously hard to project if they aren't slam dunk prospects.
2) Detroit has been notoriously bad at developing D-men. Any d-man that doesn't come with a polished game seem to be very likely to be fumbled by Detroit. Even highly thought of prospects that succeeded at every level before the NHL haven't seem to been able to make the jump.
3) Its not easy to develop good talent. If it was Edmonton should be a top team right now.
Right now Detroit has shown no ability to develop D-men. In the past they were dependent on using FA to supplement Lidstrom, and it worked well. This has left Detroit with poor scouting and development in that capacity. Until I see Detroit take a D prospect from juniors to top pairing, I am skeptical that they have the ability.
If they pick up Wahlstrom I really see them similar to Winnipeg, big bodies that can move, score, and wear you down.Also has nasty hands and has size....
I think “development” is generally overstated.
I’ve said I think we overload the GR roster too much, but otherwise I don’t see much to suggest we are bad at developing players.
I think more likely we just haven’t drafted well. And just because we’ve been bad at it doesn’t mean you don’t pick them.
Happy for Buffalo, and glad that Montreal didn't get 1st.
Development isn't that overstated actually. A lot of defense is taught/learned, and can be improved. Obviously you have to build on good bedrock to get there, but the fact that Detroit has had some very well regarded prospects and almost none have made much of a mark on the NHL tells me that there is something going on with how the team is preparing the d-men for the NHL game.
He's not going to Harvard...may end up at Michigan or BU
There's talk he could go to Michigan. Not sure how likely that is, I know Jack Hughes is a strong possibility to Michigan and they've both done well on a line together. Again, no idea what he is thinking but there's talk that Michigan is in the mix for Wahlstrom.Did he decommit? I haven't heard about that.
I'd be fine with Wahlstrom, Bouchard or Hughes. I might actually go with Wahlstrom at 6 and try to trade up to pick a D around 10th overall. Offer the Isles Mantha + the Vegas first rounder for one of their firsts.
I'd be fine with Wahlstrom, Bouchard or Hughes. I might actually go with Wahlstrom at 6 and try to trade up to pick a D around 10th overall. Offer the Isles Mantha + the Vegas first rounder for one of their firsts.
Did he decommit? I haven't heard about that.
Carolina picking second is absurd. Truly is.
Figured the lottery would screw us over.
I’m actually baffled and quite demoralized as a fan of this game. They in no way should have the second pick over Arizona, Detroit, Montreal, Ottawa or Vancouver.
Might as make it so that any team can have equal or better odds for 1OA.
And now I truly believe we get no one of significance this draft. Honestly, none of the players outside of the top three have me excited. No different than picking a player at 20 or below. None of them will have an impact like we would want imho.
I’ll be smh at Carolina picking top three for a long time...
e
If you were/are expecting top 3 picks... news flash... worst team in hockey has decent odds to pick #4 each year.
Carolina picking second is absurd. Truly is.
Blame the Sabres. It was public actions of intentional tanking that led to setting up the lottery this way.It’s ridiculous that Carolina is picking ahead of us.
I'm not happy for Buffalo.
Learn how to build a g'd roster. With the picks Buffalo has had in recent memory, there is no reason they should be as bad as they are. **** them.
Buffalo has good talent on their roster. They've just squandered the **** out of it.
Carolina is way too good? They haven’t made the playoffs in 9 years! The lottery is supposed to help out teams like that, the ones that are stuck in constant mediocrity or struggles and never quite get competitive. I’m actually happy for them. Necas+Svech/Zadina should give that team a major shot in the arm.Carolina getting #2 is pretty dumb. That team is way too good. They need to fix the lottery odds so that this stops happening. Svechnikov will be an awesome addition for them with their superb defense.
Lottery did not screw us over, we dropped only one spot. AZ and Sens got the worst deal.Carolina picking second is absurd. Truly is.
Figured the lottery would screw us over.
I’m actually baffled and quite demoralized as a fan of this game. They in no way should have the second pick over Arizona, Detroit, Montreal, Ottawa or Vancouver.
Might as make it so that any team can have equal or better odds for 1OA.
And now I truly believe we get no one of significance this draft. Honestly, none of the players outside of the top three have me excited. No different than picking a player at 20 or below. None of them will have an impact like we would want imho.
I’ll be smh at Carolina picking top three for a long time...