You sure did. We will amend the deal accordingly.Pretty sure I acquired Belpedio in a prior deal?
Belpedio, oops. I spelled Mason Shaw wrongBelpedio was already moved in the Tyler Ennis deal. Also well over the player cap. Nor would JT approve a sign and trade. He'd head to UFA and go to the highest bidder.
confirmed.Trade Announcement:
VAN: 27 Overall + Olli Juolevi + Kole Lind + Jonathan Dahlen + Sam Gagner
STL: Alex Pietrangelo
Belpedio, oops. I spelled Mason Shaw wrong
NYI was openly shopping Tavares in this scenario and without saying any names, I think there have been deals just as, or even much more unrealistic than this.
I agree it’s not the one with the farthest gap in value but I do think that it is the one that is least likely to happen. You can split it up all you want but it’s pretty much an 11 piece trade. Also if Tavares gets traded no way Isles move Bellows or Beau.I agree, Tavares was put out there right from the start. Nothing said and the deal was made with many pieces going both way. In real life does this happen, probably not but neither do some of the moves I made. It is just not real life and all deals have value going each way.
This is all for fun.. drafting and rebuilding teams to what you think..
My apologies if I over stepped by commenting..
Let it through I sayI’M GOING TO LEAVE IT UP TO THE GROUP AS TO WHAT TO DO WITH THE NYI/MIN SITUATION.
PERSONALLY I WOULD NOT ALLOW THE CIRCUMVENTION ASPECT HOWEVER I WOULD APPROVE A JT DEAL SINCE WE DO NOT HAVE A FREE AGENCY COMPONENT.
UP TO YOU GUYS.
It’s not bad enough for a veto. I think it should stay.
The 11 piece trade is the problem for me. That’s why I think it’s veto worthy.I’M GOING TO LEAVE IT UP TO THE GROUP AS TO WHAT TO DO WITH THE NYI/MIN SITUATION.
PERSONALLY I WOULD NOT ALLOW THE CIRCUMVENTION ASPECT HOWEVER I WOULD APPROVE A JT DEAL SINCE WE DO NOT HAVE A FREE AGENCY COMPONENT.
UP TO YOU GUYS.