Prospect Info: 2017 NHL Draft Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
Well the fitness-testing at the combine is not all that useful, but to be fair it's only 1 day out of 6. The others are for interviews (and one day has medical testing), which IMO are pretty important and useful.

Yeah interviews are probably the most important. I have never seen one but I wonder how much info you can get from these prospects. They are probably so trained in how to respond. You can weed out the airheads and potential issue players but its seems 90% of them would all have similar responses (again not that I would know, just going from every answer I see on TV from these guys)
 

Zaddy

Registered User
Feb 8, 2013
13,058
5,850
Yeah interviews are probably the most important. I have never seen one but I wonder how much info you can get from these prospects. They are probably so trained in how to respond. You can weed out the airheads and potential issue players but its seems 90% of them would all have similar responses (again not that I would know, just going from every answer I see on TV from these guys)

Well mainly it seems they're just trying to get the know the prospects and what they're like off the ice. I think generally they want the players to talk about themselves, rather than the executives and scouts just asking questions for them to answer.





Just some stuff I found on youtube. There's more out there I think.

Nuge and Musil got interviewed in that last one.
 
Last edited:

40oz

..........
Jan 21, 2007
16,953
9
Well the fitness-testing at the combine is not all that useful, but to be fair it's only 1 day out of 6. The others are for interviews (and one day has medical testing), which IMO are pretty important and useful.


I dont think the results of it are useful, but getting a better impression of the players physique can be. I saw this on LT's site this morning.
Jim Devellano, The Road to Hockeytown: “We’re trying to determine if the player can get to the next level, that’s the real job. Most people can sit and watch a game and tell you who the best player on the ice is, but the good scout will be able to judge whether or not a player can go a step or two higher. We in the hockey business call it projecting.”

I've been arguing against the testing part of the combine for years but IMO it's an interesting point. Made me think...
 

ImmuneEH

Registered User
Apr 2, 2017
1,200
874
To further the point of avoiding using our 1st on a LD...

In a couple years, Klefbomb & Nurse will almost certainly be on our 1st & 2nd pairing. Not to mention, we also have Sekera for at least two additional seasons as per his NMC. I'm going to assume Chiarelli will make an effort to move Sekera in the summer prior to the 2019/20 season to open up more cap space.

Given two full seasons of development, we have these prospects in the pipeline:
Reinhart - Due to waiver eligibility, he'd need to step into at least a #7 role, which might be raised due to Sekera's injury. Likely to be claimed by Vegas, however.
Oesterle - Prior to Sekera's injury, it looked like his best interests were to go elsewhere. He is someone that, if Reinhart is gone, would take hold of a bottom pairing job.
Simpson - Today, I think he is a decent call-up option, but don't know how I feel about him as a regular on the roster.

Jones - Well-rounded game with great attributes.
Paigin - He seems to have a really high ceiling, but time will tell how he translates his game to NHL rink & pace.
Lagesson - Size, speed, physicality. Defensive D who definitely has a chance.

Niemelainen & Cairns - Both seemingly long-shots.

My conclusion
In the short term, one of Oesterle or Reinhart could cover the bet. Longer term, I think after two full seasons of development one of Jones, Paigin, or Lagesson can cover the bet as a bottom pairing D. Lets just continue drafting LHD with out middling picks, our scouts have been doing a pretty solid job the past couple drafts.

Compare that to other positions.

Left Wing
Lucic is a lock for the top 6, and that's all we can be sure of. Will Maroon re-sign with us, and for a reasonable rate? Will Caggiula be a consistent point producer in the top 6? Khaira, Laleggia, and Benson (injuries!) are all promising prospects. A Robertson/Vesalainen/Kostin pick would give us a sense of security for this position though.

Center
We can't be sure that Nuge will be here when McDavid's contract kicks in. Without him, we have 2 centers in the top 6, and 2 centers in the bottom 6 if you include Khaira (who I imagine won't be counted on to step in as anything beyond 4C). We have a decent pipeline of checking centers in Gambardella, Vessel, and Rasanen (Platzer is AHL depth at this point). But top 6 center prospects? None. Thomas would be tremendous value. Smart two-way player that, if he can't play 2C, we'd be happy if he could play 2RW. If not even that, I'm sure he could at least be a long term cost effective 3C.

Right Wing
I think we can all agree Eberle is not a long-term fit with this club. Due to cap, and Nuge having more value to the team. If you run Draisaitl 1RW, things aren't all that bad. Puljujarvi is essentially the only bonafide top 6 RW prospect we have, and we can't count on him to be ready for next season. We're not entirely sure what we have in Slepyshev, but he's at least a middle 6 RW. He can play 3rd line minutes just fine, but who knows if he can become a staple in the top 6. For bottom 6 players, we have Kassian, Pakarinen, and a couple maybes' (Pitlick/Foo). We don't have any good prospects outside of the NHL team. If we draft a RW, grab the best shooter who has a knack for finding open space, as Draisaitl & McDavid are excellent pass-first type guys.

Right Defense
This position is clouded in mystery. We need an answer for RD today, I imagine Chia figures something out via trade. Acquiring a 2RD would keep Benning at the bottom pairing, which is good for depth. Benning himself might even become a 2nd pairing guy. I wouldn't count on Bear or Mantha being 2nd pairing guys, but would be ecstatic if they become reliable options for the 3rd pairing. Would be happy with a Timmins pick, as it would give us stability for defensemen prospects.
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
I dont think the results of it are useful, but getting a better impression of the players physique can be. I saw this on LT's site this morning.


I've been arguing against the testing part of the combine for years but IMO it's an interesting point. Made me think...

I wonder how much of this is scouts overestimating how much they actually know. Seems like its an incredibly tall task to project 17/18 year old players when they are so raw on ice and so undeveloped physique wise. Two massive unknowns that are so hard to predict stand alone, much less when you try and combine them. Seems like its trying to predict a stock share price 7 years down the road and to do this you request to have a full walk thru of the headquarters

Really for me I dont mind if there is more info out there and they have this testing. I just have big issues with fans and media treating the combine as this sacred event that will tell you a ton. For the scouts, maybe they use the results more cautiously, but id still be very weary. I mean how many of them are trained not only in scouting the on ice play AND being able to project players using combine results as an 17 year old
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
Right Defense
This position is clouded in mystery. We need an answer for RD today, I imagine Chia figures something out via trade. Acquiring a 2RD would keep Benning at the bottom pairing, which is good for depth. Benning himself might even become a 2nd pairing guy. I wouldn't count on Bear or Mantha being 2nd pairing guys, but would be ecstatic if they become reliable options for the 3rd pairing. Would be happy with a Timmins pick, as it would give us stability for defensemen prospects.

Honestly our RD is almost as locked up as LD. I think we can all agree not to factor Sekera into this pick since hes only forsure here next 2 years, and nearly none of 20-31st overall prospects will be ready in next two years. But at RD we have Larsson as forsure long term option (same as Klefbom) and id wager a pretty penny Benning has same odds of being a 2nd pairing D as Nurse does, so similar their again. After those 4, I have Jones as one of the only long term options of significance. For RD I have Bear as having good upside too. So similar there. Next Mantha is a pretty good RD prospect and id have him and Reinhart as similiar upside

So even tho RD has been an issue last 5 years, I think now its looking to be pretty set with Larsson, Benning, Bear/Mantha 2 years down the road
 

40oz

..........
Jan 21, 2007
16,953
9
I wonder how much of this is scouts overestimating how much they actually know. Seems like its an incredibly tall task to project 17/18 year old players when they are so raw on ice and so undeveloped physique wise. Two massive unknowns that are so hard to predict stand alone, much less when you try and combine them. Seems like its trying to predict a stock share price 7 years down the road and to do this you request to have a full walk thru of the headquarters

Really for me I dont mind if there is more info out there and they have this testing. I just have big issues with fans and media treating the combine as this sacred event that will tell you a ton. For the scouts, maybe they use the results more cautiously, but id still be very weary. I mean how many of them are trained not only in scouting the on ice play AND being able to project players using combine results as an 17 year old

Probably allllll the time. It's the draft age more than anything, but scouting in the NHL isn't great. Really a crap shoot.

I think/hope teams would bring someone from their training/medical staff to evaluate this kind of stuff rather than the scouts. But yah i totally agree with your second paragraph. The best part of the combine is getting accurate heights/weights and maybe some good interview stories. The fact that the NHL combine is so small, like 115 players as opposed to 300+ in the NFL means you only get the top prospects, who're probably well coached on everything combine related.
 

Zaddy

Registered User
Feb 8, 2013
13,058
5,850
Alright, if these players are still on the board when the Oilers pick at #22, who would you guys choose and why?

LW Kristian Vesalainen, Frölunda (SHL)
LW Jason Robertson, Kingston (OHL)
LW Matthew Strome, Hamilton (OHL)

C Nick Suzuki, Owen Sound (OHL)
C Robert Thomas, London (OHL)
C Shane Bowers, Waterloo (OHL)
C Ryan Poehling, St. Cloud (NCAA)

RW Klim Kostin, Dynamo Moskva (KHL)
RW Kole Lind, Kelowna (WHL)

RD Callan Foote, Kelowna (WHL)
RD Conor Timmins, Sault Ste. Marie (OHL)
RD Henri Jokiharju, Portland (WHL)

Certainly not an easy choice, and it feels a lot harder when you put it up in a list like this. So many options and players that are interesting. Maybe another good reason to move down. Then again if you really like someone...
 

ImmuneEH

Registered User
Apr 2, 2017
1,200
874
Honestly our RD is almost as locked up as LD. I think we can all agree not to factor Sekera into this pick since hes only forsure here next 2 years, and nearly none of 20-31st overall prospects will be ready in next two years. But at RD we have Larsson as forsure long term option (same as Klefbom) and id wager a pretty penny Benning has same odds of being a 2nd pairing D as Nurse does, so similar their again. After those 4, I have Jones as one of the only long term options of significance. For RD I have Bear as having good upside too. So similar there. Next Mantha is a pretty good RD prospect and id have him and Reinhart as similiar upside

So even tho RD has been an issue last 5 years, I think now its looking to be pretty set with Larsson, Benning, Bear/Mantha 2 years down the road

True. We do have Berglund and Marino who are solid prospects. It might even be better to see if we can sign NCAA RD's down the road.
 

ImmuneEH

Registered User
Apr 2, 2017
1,200
874
Alright, if these players are still on the board when the Oilers pick at #22, who would you guys choose and why?

LW Kristian Vesalainen, Frölunda (SHL)
LW Jason Robertson, Kingston (OHL)
LW Matthew Strome, Hamilton (OHL)

C Nick Suzuki, Owen Sound (OHL)
C Robert Thomas, London (OHL)
C Shane Bowers, Waterloo (OHL)
C Ryan Poehling, St. Cloud (NCAA)

RW Klim Kostin, Dynamo Moskva (KHL)
RW Kole Lind, Kelowna (WHL)

RD Callan Foote, Kelowna (WHL)
RD Conor Timmins, Sault Ste. Marie (OHL)
RD Henri Jokiharju, Portland (WHL)

Certainly not an easy choice, and it feels a lot harder when you put it up in a list like this. So many options and players that are interesting. Maybe another good reason to move down. Then again if you really like someone...

Thomas. Gives Todd McLellan a lot of flexibility if he has a guy that can play 3C & 2RW for example. Would be excellent if he eventually is able to be a reliable guy at 2C as well.

For wingers, can't go wrong with Vasalainen, Robertson, and Lind. I like the Yamamoto pick as well, because I think he can succeed in our system. We have big players to create space for him, and centers excellent at finding players in the scoring areas.
 

40oz

..........
Jan 21, 2007
16,953
9
Alright, if these players are still on the board when the Oilers pick at #22, who would you guys choose and why?

LW Kristian Vesalainen, Frölunda (SHL)
LW Jason Robertson, Kingston (OHL)
LW Matthew Strome, Hamilton (OHL)

C Nick Suzuki, Owen Sound (OHL)
C Robert Thomas, London (OHL)
C Shane Bowers, Waterloo (OHL)
C Ryan Poehling, St. Cloud (NCAA)

RW Klim Kostin, Dynamo Moskva (KHL)
RW Kole Lind, Kelowna (WHL)

RD Callan Foote, Kelowna (WHL)
RD Conor Timmins, Sault Ste. Marie (OHL)
RD Henri Jokiharju, Portland (WHL)

Certainly not an easy choice, and it feels a lot harder when you put it up in a list like this. So many options and players that are interesting. Maybe another good reason to move down. Then again if you really like someone...


My preference:
1. Suzuki
2. Timmins
3. Thomas
4. Jokiharju
5. Lind
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
Alright, if these players are still on the board when the Oilers pick at #22, who would you guys choose and why?

LW Kristian Vesalainen, Frölunda (SHL)
LW Jason Robertson, Kingston (OHL)
LW Matthew Strome, Hamilton (OHL)

C Nick Suzuki, Owen Sound (OHL)
C Robert Thomas, London (OHL)
C Shane Bowers, Waterloo (OHL)
C Ryan Poehling, St. Cloud (NCAA)

RW Klim Kostin, Dynamo Moskva (KHL)
RW Kole Lind, Kelowna (WHL)

RD Callan Foote, Kelowna (WHL)
RD Conor Timmins, Sault Ste. Marie (OHL)
RD Henri Jokiharju, Portland (WHL)

Certainly not an easy choice, and it feels a lot harder when you put it up in a list like this. So many options and players that are interesting. Maybe another good reason to move down. Then again if you really like someone...

My preference:

1AAAA) Suzuki- Feeling hell be one of best forwards this draft similar to Pastanrek in 2014, Giroux in 06 and Eberle in 2008.

2) Timmins- ditto for him and D. Love his scouting report and underlying numbers
2b) Brannstrom- bonus

3) Kostin- great scouting reports, would be anothe rbig body who can skate


4/5/6/7 Lind, Poelhing, Thomas, Bower are all a toss up for me. A) dont know enough b) all have similarly good scouting reports

8) Jokiharju- dont know too much about him but id be ok with this pick, good numbers first year in NA. Rightie with offence

9) Vasalanien- sounds too much like MPS or Joensuu

10) Foote- least good of the scouting reports for above guys. Hate D with skating issues. Although I have a weird feeling hell end up pretty good. Still would not pick him above the rest

Others: too little info to make a call. Stromes seem like a family of busts or let downs
 

CornKicker

Holland is wrong..except all of the good things
Feb 18, 2005
12,151
3,621
To further the point of avoiding using our 1st on a LD...

In a couple years, Klefbomb & Nurse will almost certainly be on our 1st & 2nd pairing. Not to mention, we also have Sekera for at least two additional seasons as per his NMC. I'm going to assume Chiarelli will make an effort to move Sekera in the summer prior to the 2019/20 season to open up more cap space.

Given two full seasons of development, we have these prospects in the pipeline:
Reinhart - Due to waiver eligibility, he'd need to step into at least a #7 role, which might be raised due to Sekera's injury. Likely to be claimed by Vegas, however.
Oesterle - Prior to Sekera's injury, it looked like his best interests were to go elsewhere. He is someone that, if Reinhart is gone, would take hold of a bottom pairing job.
Simpson - Today, I think he is a decent call-up option, but don't know how I feel about him as a regular on the roster.

Jones - Well-rounded game with great attributes.
Paigin - He seems to have a really high ceiling, but time will tell how he translates his game to NHL rink & pace.
Lagesson - Size, speed, physicality. Defensive D who definitely has a chance.

Niemelainen & Cairns - Both seemingly long-shots.

My conclusion
In the short term, one of Oesterle or Reinhart could cover the bet. Longer term, I think after two full seasons of development one of Jones, Paigin, or Lagesson can cover the bet as a bottom pairing D. Lets just continue drafting LHD with out middling picks, our scouts have been doing a pretty solid job the past couple drafts.

Compare that to other positions.

Left Wing
Lucic is a lock for the top 6, and that's all we can be sure of. Will Maroon re-sign with us, and for a reasonable rate? Will Caggiula be a consistent point producer in the top 6? Khaira, Laleggia, and Benson (injuries!) are all promising prospects. A Robertson/Vesalainen/Kostin pick would give us a sense of security for this position though.

Center
We can't be sure that Nuge will be here when McDavid's contract kicks in. Without him, we have 2 centers in the top 6, and 2 centers in the bottom 6 if you include Khaira (who I imagine won't be counted on to step in as anything beyond 4C). We have a decent pipeline of checking centers in Gambardella, Vessel, and Rasanen (Platzer is AHL depth at this point). But top 6 center prospects? None. Thomas would be tremendous value. Smart two-way player that, if he can't play 2C, we'd be happy if he could play 2RW. If not even that, I'm sure he could at least be a long term cost effective 3C.

Right Wing
I think we can all agree Eberle is not a long-term fit with this club. Due to cap, and Nuge having more value to the team. If you run Draisaitl 1RW, things aren't all that bad. Puljujarvi is essentially the only bonafide top 6 RW prospect we have, and we can't count on him to be ready for next season. We're not entirely sure what we have in Slepyshev, but he's at least a middle 6 RW. He can play 3rd line minutes just fine, but who knows if he can become a staple in the top 6. For bottom 6 players, we have Kassian, Pakarinen, and a couple maybes' (Pitlick/Foo). We don't have any good prospects outside of the NHL team. If we draft a RW, grab the best shooter who has a knack for finding open space, as Draisaitl & McDavid are excellent pass-first type guys.

Right Defense
This position is clouded in mystery. We need an answer for RD today, I imagine Chia figures something out via trade. Acquiring a 2RD would keep Benning at the bottom pairing, which is good for depth. Benning himself might even become a 2nd pairing guy. I wouldn't count on Bear or Mantha being 2nd pairing guys, but would be ecstatic if they become reliable options for the 3rd pairing. Would be happy with a Timmins pick, as it would give us stability for defensemen prospects.

i counter with draft the BPA and if we become overloaded at one spot then we can look to do a Seth jones for Ryan Johnsen type of deal. you cant leave a better prospect on the table because in 4 years you project to not need him. Drafting for need is the worst strategy at the nhl draft table. The only time position should come into play should be if all else is equal between 2 prospects.
 

CornKicker

Holland is wrong..except all of the good things
Feb 18, 2005
12,151
3,621
Alright, if these players are still on the board when the Oilers pick at #22, who would you guys choose and why?

LW Kristian Vesalainen, Frölunda (SHL)
LW Jason Robertson, Kingston (OHL)
LW Matthew Strome, Hamilton (OHL)

C Nick Suzuki, Owen Sound (OHL)
C Robert Thomas, London (OHL)
C Shane Bowers, Waterloo (OHL)
C Ryan Poehling, St. Cloud (NCAA)

RW Klim Kostin, Dynamo Moskva (KHL)
RW Kole Lind, Kelowna (WHL)

RD Callan Foote, Kelowna (WHL)
RD Conor Timmins, Sault Ste. Marie (OHL)
RD Henri Jokiharju, Portland (WHL)

Certainly not an easy choice, and it feels a lot harder when you put it up in a list like this. So many options and players that are interesting. Maybe another good reason to move down. Then again if you really like someone...

im waivering betwen thomas and timmins. I feel like timmins can drive offence from the back and i like his top end potential more than anyone else. he strikes me as a ryan ellis type.
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
i counter with draft the BPA and if we become overloaded at one spot then we can look to do a Seth jones for Ryan Johnsen type of deal. you cant leave a better prospect on the table because in 4 years you project to not need him. Drafting for need is the worst strategy at the nhl draft table. The only time position should come into play should be if all else is equal between 2 prospects.

Drafting for need only becomes an issue when you really reach for a player due to need. Id say Musil is the example of this and we knowingly reached for a defensive D

Alot of time BPA is muddy and a number of prospects are all in same tier, so your ok drafting for need if you hold that a group of 5 D all have similar chances of making it

Like if we pick Kostin or Lind or whoever over Brannstrom id be ok with that because hard to predict who is legit BPA. But if we reach for RW sniper and pick a 50th ranked prospect to draft for need ill be pissed
 

suddeninterest

Registered User
Aug 19, 2014
843
163
Alright, if these players are still on the board when the Oilers pick at #22, who would you guys choose and why?

LW Kristian Vesalainen, Frölunda (SHL)
LW Jason Robertson, Kingston (OHL)
LW Matthew Strome, Hamilton (OHL)

C Nick Suzuki, Owen Sound (OHL)
C Robert Thomas, London (OHL)
C Shane Bowers, Waterloo (OHL)
C Ryan Poehling, St. Cloud (NCAA)

RW Klim Kostin, Dynamo Moskva (KHL)
RW Kole Lind, Kelowna (WHL)

RD Callan Foote, Kelowna (WHL)
RD Conor Timmins, Sault Ste. Marie (OHL)
RD Henri Jokiharju, Portland (WHL)

Certainly not an easy choice, and it feels a lot harder when you put it up in a list like this. So many options and players that are interesting. Maybe another good reason to move down. Then again if you really like someone...

If Suzuki is on the board imo it would have to be him because I think he is both the BPA there and a position of need (RHC).

If not then I'm probably in the minority but I like Cal Foote. I think he's perfect long term for the 2nd pair and will pretty much be Larsson 2.0. Guy is just so good 1 on 1, with his stick, and with his positioning, and also knows how to make nice little plays on the boards. I think he's very much like Larsson where he's not the fastest guy but he makes up for it with an excellent defensive IQ, and I think he could learn a ton from Larsson in the system. Honestly he and Nurse could make an amazing 2nd pair in a few years as they compliment each other really well in terms of skill set imo.
 

Stud Muffin

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
5,414
1,014
Manitoba
Alright, if these players are still on the board when the Oilers pick at #22, who would you guys choose and why?

LW Kristian Vesalainen, Frölunda (SHL)
LW Jason Robertson, Kingston (OHL)
LW Matthew Strome, Hamilton (OHL)

C Nick Suzuki, Owen Sound (OHL)
C Robert Thomas, London (OHL)
C Shane Bowers, Waterloo (OHL)
C Ryan Poehling, St. Cloud (NCAA)

RW Klim Kostin, Dynamo Moskva (KHL)
RW Kole Lind, Kelowna (WHL)

RD Callan Foote, Kelowna (WHL)
RD Conor Timmins, Sault Ste. Marie (OHL)
RD Henri Jokiharju, Portland (WHL)

Certainly not an easy choice, and it feels a lot harder when you put it up in a list like this. So many options and players that are interesting. Maybe another good reason to move down. Then again if you really like someone...

I'm gonna pretend Suzuki isn't there, because I'm pretty sure he'll be gone. I would have it widdled down to Kostin,Vesalainen,Thomas and Foote. I'd have no idea where I'd go, probably a forward but that would be for the scouts to decide.
 

936LeafsOilers997

Registered User
Dec 31, 2015
229
0
It will be nice to add someone who hopefully will be in the starting line up for cheap (entry level) in a couple of years.. let's hope the scouts make the right pick..
 

smokersarejokers

Registered User
Jul 7, 2005
2,974
1,038
I'm gonna pretend Suzuki isn't there, because I'm pretty sure he'll be gone. I would have it widdled down to Kostin,Vesalainen,Thomas and Foote. I'd have no idea where I'd go, probably a forward but that would be for the scouts to decide.

I agree.

I think Suzuki will be gone, so I'll say Thomas.
 

Game 8

Registered User
Mar 8, 2003
2,245
244
Glass

Center
We can't be sure that Nuge will be here when McDavid's contract kicks in. Without him, we have 2 centers in the top 6, and 2 centers in the bottom 6 if you include Khaira (who I imagine won't be counted on to step in as anything beyond 4C). We have a decent pipeline of checking centers in Gambardella, Vessel, and Rasanen (Platzer is AHL depth at this point). But top 6 center prospects? None. Thomas would be tremendous value. Smart two-way player that, if he can't play 2C, we'd be happy if he could play 2RW. If not even that, I'm sure he could at least be a long term cost effective 3C.

Good post agree with it all except Centers. Benson will be a great top 9 center.
 
Last edited:

McAsuno

Registered User
Jul 10, 2013
27,470
37,871
Edmonton
DBAhFK4XYAA8oyo.jpg:large

I wonder which prospects the Oilers crew will keep more attention on.
 

Roof Daddy

Registered User
Apr 1, 2008
13,198
2,380
Alright, if these players are still on the board when the Oilers pick at #22, who would you guys choose and why?

LW Kristian Vesalainen, Frölunda (SHL)
LW Jason Robertson, Kingston (OHL)
LW Matthew Strome, Hamilton (OHL)

C Nick Suzuki, Owen Sound (OHL)
C Robert Thomas, London (OHL)
C Shane Bowers, Waterloo (OHL)
C Ryan Poehling, St. Cloud (NCAA)

RW Klim Kostin, Dynamo Moskva (KHL)
RW Kole Lind, Kelowna (WHL)

RD Callan Foote, Kelowna (WHL)
RD Conor Timmins, Sault Ste. Marie (OHL)
RD Henri Jokiharju, Portland (WHL)

Certainly not an easy choice, and it feels a lot harder when you put it up in a list like this. So many options and players that are interesting. Maybe another good reason to move down. Then again if you really like someone...

Timmins. Seems like a safe bet to carve out an NHL career, playing style and attributes resemble Benning. I won't pretend I know much about these prospects compared to many posting here, but it seems like the guy is a late bloomer who is good at everything, just doesn't have any dynamic element to his game, and that's the reason he's projected as a late 1st.

Considering the weakness of our pool, the (supposed) weakness of the draft, the NHL projectability of the player, and the value of RHD, he seems like the wisest pick.
 

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
74,115
30,261
Timmins. Seems like a safe bet to carve out an NHL career, playing style and attributes resemble Benning. I won't pretend I know much about these prospects compared to many posting here, but it seems like the guy is a late bloomer who is good at everything, just doesn't have any dynamic element to his game, and that's the reason he's projected as a late 1st.

Considering the weakness of our pool, the (supposed) weakness of the draft, the NHL projectability of the player, and the value of RHD, he seems like the wisest pick.

I don't like this line of thinking. Go for someone dynamic, we can afford to swing for the fences now. Pick the player with the highest upside IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad