Not really considering I'd gladly take Liljegren at 8 and be more than happy with the pick.
Liljegren is in my clear top 7 for our needs and Mittelstadt is who I project to be available to us at 8.
Not really considering I'd gladly take Liljegren at 8 and be more than happy with the pick.
PROSPECT NEED TO KNOW: MAKAR HAS HAD METEORIC RISE UP THE DRAFT BOARDS
Cale Makar, D – Brooks Bandits (AJHL): One of the most dynamic defensemen in the 2017 draft class, Makar will likely do battle with Finland’s Miro Heiskanen as the first blueliner off the board. On top of a record-setting performance at the World Jr. A Challenge this season (he had five points in the tournament opener for Canada West), Makar has steered his Bandits to an Alberta Jr. A League title and now he’s gunning for more.
Brooks is currently playing at the Western Cup, which brings together the champions (and a host team) from the Jr. A leagues in the western provinces. And Makar and the Bandits will not sit back – that’s not their style.
“Whenever I get the opportunity to rush the puck, I’m going to take it,” Makar said. “In Brooks, we’re not a chip-and-chase kind of team – we want possession.”
That attitude is one of the reasons Makar is rated so high for the draft, despite his 5-foot-10, 175-pound frame. An excellent skater and puckhandler, he put up 75 points in 54 regular season games, then added 18 in 13 playoff contests. It’s been a meteoric rise.
“At the beginning of the season, my goal was to be a first-round pick,” he said. “I try not to look too much at rankings because you never know what can happen, but it’s been really cool.”
Cousin Mark Logan helped bring Makar to Brooks and influenced the defenseman to go the NCAA route (Logan is at R.I.T. right now). Makar is committed to UMass, a school that showed interest in the youngster from the start. Once there, Makar believes he will benefit from the development curve and off-ice training he’ll get with the Minutemen.
“It was pretty easy to say yes,” Makar said.
In the meantime, the Calgary native will continue on his quest for more hardware. If he and his boys can win the Western Cup (or even come second), they’ll move on to the national Jr. A championship – the RBC Cup. Don’t bet against them.
2017 DRAFT STARS
Lias Andersson, C – HV71 (SHL): There’s no experience like championship experience and Andersson finished his SHL season with a bang, helping HV71 to a Swedish League title. The competitive two-way center had two points in the seven-game series win over Brynas, while centering the second line.
Joel Teasdale, LW – Blainville-Boisbriand (QMJHL): An all-situations player that scouts call a “coach’s dream,” Teasdale has been at his best when the Armada have been closing out their past two playoff series. His skating needs work, but with 15 points in 16 games, he’s helping his draft cause.
Ben Mirageas, D – Chicago Steel (USHL): Mirageas played for a dump-and-chase Bloomington team for most of the season and languished. But a trade to Chicago saw his offense jump dramatically and now the Providence College commit is making a nice playoff run with the Steel. Smart and athletic, Mirageas needs to get tougher to play against.
Eeli Tolvanen, LW – Sioux City Musketeers (USHL): One of the most dangerous offensive players in the draft, Tolvanen has continued his exploits in the USHL playoffs, helping Sioux City to the Western Conference final. The Boston College commit with the deadly release has five points in five games for the Musketeers.
Owen Tippett, RW – Mississauga Steelheads (OHL): With eight points in his past eight playoff games, Tippett is heating up at the right time. The Steelheads will need all hands on deck when they take on Erie in the OHL final and Tippett’s combination of speed and a powerful shot can certainly help from the second line.
Every word you wrote is wrong. So that's impressive.
D-men usually take several years before becoming something in the NHL.
Better to trade down acquire a defenseman that way and take some of the good d-men in second and third-round instead.
I just saw Lias Andersson ...
This year kind of proved otherwise.
2016 draft: McAvoy played solid minutes this year in the playoffs, Chychrun had a good year for Arizona, and we can assume that Sergachev and Joulevi will be making their respective teams in fall 2017.
2015 draft: Hanifen, Provorov, and Werenski all played full seasons this year, with Werenski getting a Calder nom.
Defensively he's the best forward I've seen at his age. Reminds me of Zetterberg but with more grit. He has the skills to dangle but really picks his moments. His focus and discipline is what impresses me the most. He was prepared to do what it takes to win and I'd love to get a Buffalo player with experience from playing hockey in Jönköping/HV71. That championship team was really something special.
If we trade Reinhart I'd really like us to pick Lias at 8th.
He might not get as many points as a guy like William Nylander, but he'll win you more games.
How realistic is #8 in 2017 for Fowler? I think Buffalo has to add to that.
Regardless of our needs, if the new management decides to keep the puck and we leave with one of Makar/Liljegren/Middlestadt/Tippett/Andersson I would be very happy.
I have this really strong feeling that with Hischier, Patrick and Vilardi off the board at number 6, Vegas will take Rasmussen. McPhee is going to be looking for a tentpole to put in the middle of his franchise, and they don't get much bigger than 6'5". Hopefully that pushes one of Heiskanen or Makar to us, though I doubt it even then.
Those guys would have to get past Colorado and Arizona, both of which have spent all (nearly) of their top picks on forwards for years. Give up that dream.
I'm not so sure about either team, to be honest. I can see Colorado going forward once again and Chayka is all about the analytics rather than positional need. Could be some surprising results. All I know is I can't wait to see it play out.
I'm not so sure about either team, to be honest. I can see Colorado going forward once again and Chayka is all about the analytics rather than positional need. Could be some surprising results. All I know is I can't wait to see it play out.
When Colorado was a favorite to have the #1 or #2, it was a foregone conclusion that they would be adding a forward. I think it still could be.
Analytics is not just crunching numbers. It is about using ALL available information, numbers, video, coaching, scouting reports, interviews, etc.
With that said, drafts are extremely random. Look at the NFL draft -- a player gets unexpectedly picked early (or one falls) and the draft completely changes from consensus. We've also seen that there is not really a clear cut top 5 (outside of Patrick / Hischer), and there is trouble coming to a consensus on a top 10.
IMO your situation is definitely possible but not probable. I agree that watching the draft will be fun because nobody can tell how it is going to playout.
So this glass fellow, he scores goals, with a quickness. Let's just draft him and go full oil.