GDT: 2016 NHL Draft

Finlandia WOAT

No blocks, No slappers
May 23, 2010
24,416
24,693
Gauthier scored 40 in the QMJHL. I take back what o said, he has skill. No reason to gwt him into the NHL, no team is one non lottery 18 year old away from success.
 

Novacane

Registered User
Jan 25, 2012
24,992
9,048
Raleigh, NC
With how physically developed Gauthier is, is he a case of someone that would be better suited in the AHL than the Q in an ideal world? I guess he could work on his playmaking reading the statline.
 
Last edited:

geehaad

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2006
7,531
18,994
he roofs like four of the first 5 goals.

Yeah, this one. I guess I don't understand what you meant when you said that he couldn't finish an unelevated puck from in close. With him roofing all of these goals from close to the net, isn't that showing that he has good hands in close?

 

DaveG

Noted Jerk
Apr 7, 2003
52,242
52,257
Winston-Salem NC
Sadomasochism

Stop looking at my computer damnit.


I mean wait... wut?



Smart move on Gauthier here is one more year of junior though. Don't rush this kid, he has the potential and the skillset already in place to be a good one, and it's capable of being developed even more. Far from a finished game-ready product even if he has some game-ready attributes.


so, right now, looks like the big name that's still on the board is DeBrincat, but there's also Bastien, Asplund, Abramov, Mascherin, Mattson, Bitten, and Koukkanen out there. Decent chance we get one of them.
 

Ole Gil

Registered User
May 9, 2009
5,764
9,204
Yeah, this one. I guess I don't understand what you meant when you said that he couldn't finish an unelevated puck from in close. With him roofing all of these goals from close to the net, isn't that showing that he has good hands in close?

I have no idea. Maybe it was Logan Brown, but he's a playmaker, so I don't know why it'd have bothered me even if it was him?

Maybe Jordan Staal?
 

The Faulker 27

Registered User
Nov 15, 2011
13,138
48,425
Sauna-Aho
What you said was to play 4th line minutes and stand in front of the net. Brendan Woods can do that and not stunt Gauthiers development and take a year off his ELC.

Actually, what I said was play 4th line minutes, special teams, stand in front of the net minutes. What I meant was he could do all or some of that and if he became a skilled net front presence that could be extremely beneficial for the team. I don't disagree you though. A year in the AHL isn't going to hurt a bit, I just think at his size and relative skill he appears to be capable of contributing next season. I'm eyeballing it of course.
 

The Faulker 27

Registered User
Nov 15, 2011
13,138
48,425
Sauna-Aho
I agree that he doesn't appear to have "pure goal scorer" ability, but my point is the Canes still seem him as a goal scorer (as was stated by their head scout). Based on skill alone, nobody would call Holmstrom or Franzen "goal scorers", but that's what they did. So to say "They didn't draft him for his scoring ability, that's as obvious as it gets" is really a misrepresentation. Did they draft him as a "sniper"? No, but they drafted him as a big guy that can pot goals down low, in other words, for his scoring ability.

In terms of him not being drafted where he was if he was 5'11", 175, that's totally irrelevant. If he was 5'11", 175, he'd be playing a totally different style of game which wouldn't be relevant to this.

True, I was off with my initial comment. I just didn't see a goal scorer when I watched some of the highlight videos but a guy that is so much bigger than his peers that driving the net, and over powering to score isnt a big problem. On closer inspection he's got a pretty good release.
 

geehaad

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2006
7,531
18,994
The other knock on him I've read here is his goal::assist ratio, and I know that someone pointed it out previously, but this wasn't an issue in the previous year(s). Obviously I don't know why this past year was so different, but maybe it's dumb luck or maybe his linemates couldn't cash in, or maybe he just ****ing scored when the puck was on his stick. Who knows, but I don't see it as a major red flag.
 

DaveG

Noted Jerk
Apr 7, 2003
52,242
52,257
Winston-Salem NC
The other knock on him I've read here is his goal::assist ratio, and I know that someone pointed it out previously, but this wasn't an issue in the previous year(s). Obviously I don't know why this past year was so different, but maybe it's dumb luck or maybe his linemates couldn't cash in, or maybe he just ****ing scored when the puck was on his stick. Who knows, but I don't see it as a major red flag.

Yep. A lot of concern was raised that he was a "selfish" player but I'm just not buying it. The guy can pass, but he's an absolute sniper. If the puck's not falling for your linemates and you have the capacity to put it in with that kind of authority and regularity yourself then you absolutely 100% do just that.
 

geehaad

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2006
7,531
18,994
I wonder how low of a real payroll you could get to by acquiring as many dead contracts as possible.

Holy crap...I didn't realize they still have one more year of Pronger at nearly $5M! Only $500K in real money, but that's $12.5M of nothing.
 

Roboturner913

Registered User
Jul 3, 2012
25,853
55,526
The other knock on him I've read here is his goal::assist ratio, and I know that someone pointed it out previously, but this wasn't an issue in the previous year(s). Obviously I don't know why this past year was so different, but maybe it's dumb luck or maybe his linemates couldn't cash in, or maybe he just ****ing scored when the puck was on his stick. Who knows, but I don't see it as a major red flag.

I could not care less how many assists a goal-scoring power wing has. That's just not his job. Worrying about that is just nitpicking for its own sake.
 

AD Skinner

Registered User
Mar 18, 2009
13,277
40,872
bubble bath
So we got a forward who wears #12 and a defenseman who wears #2...

6303ab8d5e4063d88f516b2b40bb1e5f.jpg
 

My Special Purpose

Registered User
Apr 8, 2008
8,151
21,787
My thought on the Canes first two picks: they knew they wanted a D and an F just to keep the pipeline for both stocked. They ran their internal mocks both ways, taking a F at 13 and a D at 13 and found that they were able to get a better combo taking the D first. It makes sense, too, if you buy that premise, because all the top D-men were gone by 21.
 

GoldiFox

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
13,287
32,030
My thought on the Canes first two picks: they knew they wanted a D and an F just to keep the pipeline for both stocked. They ran their internal mocks both ways, taking a F at 13 and a D at 13 and found that they were able to get a better combo taking the D first. It makes sense, too, if you buy that premise, because all the top D-men were gone by 21.

Agreed.

Can't be too upset about it with the way the Draft fell. I liked a couple of the forwards more at #13, but the whole grouping (Bellows, Kunin, Gauthier, Jones, Rubstov, etc.) was basically one tier. If they were confident one would fall to them then it makes sense to take their top rated D. I'd like to hear where they had Bean ranked among D, Bob McKenzie said the top 3 D after Juolevi (Sergachev, Bean, and Chychrun) were also one tier. Wouldn't shock me if they had Bean rated fairly high.
 

GoldiFox

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
13,287
32,030
Things look pretty good for Rounds 2 and 3. Lot of talent left that could fall to #43 and even #67/74/75. DeBrincat, Katchouk, Mascherin, Kuokkanen, or Kyrou would be my favorites.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad