I agree with the top boldfaced. I think as constructed with LHD and RHD Wilson did a great job assembling the Sharks' top 4.
I was being tongue-in-cheek about 'whoever is left' but Dillon is garbage and I would easily take Gravel and probably even Trotman over him. He's the guy I watch get victimized over and over and over for the Sharks (Polak nonwithstanding as he doesn't exist now).
I also agree it's not comfortable place to be, but comparing this d-core to 2012 is gonna be a fool's errand as that was a dream d-core. The "Voynov gap" as we've come to lovingly call it is the no-man's-land that seems irreplaceable right now and creates a huge gap between Doughty-Muzzin-Martinez and everyone else. I'm hoping McNabb can be that guy (I think he's right there, but I realize I'm in the minority) but that's still LHD heavy and Martinez has been playing like a trooper but is at a visible disadvantage on his wrong side.
Long story short, my overall point wasn't that the Kings d-core is definitively better than the Sharks at this point in time, it was that it's debatable, and certainly not as terrible as is being suggested. But I think it comes with a fair amount of questions--what does McNabb do for an encore, how do Gravel/Forbort acclimate, what does Gilbert have left in the tank (top 4? 5-6? dead in the water?), what does Trotman do (should be a #7 at this point, may surprise), and what is with Scuderi and Greene? But that's not all that different than all the other 'top' d in the division. Sharks have to wonder who they have in DeMelo, Ducks have to wonder who is on the way out and how to handle Bieksa, etc.