Therick67
Registered User
Crosby is right in front of him, not like he's got to turn his head to look for him. He's also looking for that puck thing.
Like or Hate Crosby and the Pens, its not good to see him like that.
Ovy being Ovy with a dirty play to start the whole thing off.
Crosby is right in front of him, not like he's got to turn his head to look for him. He's also looking for that puck thing.
Like or Hate Crosby and the Pens, its not good to see him like that.
Ovy being Ovy with a dirty play to start the whole thing off.
Disagree, Niskanen had no interference from another player, no reason to line him up and plenty of time to avoid crosschecking him in the head. I can see why people could claim it was unintentional, but Niskanen has the skill and awareness to avoid doing what he did. Hell, he even changed direction after Crosby started to fall. . .
I don't think we'd be talking about that hit if it didn't happen to Crosby.
I think if a player is lining up to hit another player yes he's going to be looking at him to make sure he hits the guy, after all the guy has the ability to move to avoid contact. I don't see Niskanen doing that here but of course I can't read his mind as to his intention to injure Crosby or not.
This further confuses me.
I think the Niskanen hit was dirty and purposeful. I can't believe that it isn't going to be subject to further discipline.
We've seen far less get punished more severely.
I saw that . He gets away with SO much
Here's a little newsflash for you, Niskanen is just as entitled to that space as Crosby is. Niskanen had the awareness to determine that a player was going for the same piece of real estate that he was and braced himself for a collision. It was unfortunate that Crosby was on his knees and took the shot in the helmet instead of the arm/chest, where contact would have been made if he was more upright.
One could make the argument that Crosby, if he were punished the way other players are, has more of a "history" than Niskanen. Both he, Ovechkin, Subban, and a few select others have gotten away with stuff that would have cost Marchand many, many games.
Here's a little newsflash for you, Niskanen is just as entitled to that space as Crosby is. Niskanen had the awareness to determine that a player was going for the same piece of real estate that he was and braced himself for a collision. It was unfortunate that Crosby was on his knees and took the shot in the helmet instead of the arm/chest, where contact would have been made if he was more upright.
Sure he has right to that space- he doesn't have the right to get his head with a crosscheck (again, made the move toward him after Crosby started falling).
Totally agree that it's getting more attention b/c its Crosby, but IMO its a dirtbag play no matter who's on the receiving end (except for Cooke maybe).
Hey, Ex-Bruins discussion! Where's the playoff thread?
I have watched the play many, many times. You have your interpretation and I have mine...and never the two shall meet. I'm not even sure he deserved two minutes, let alone 5 and the game.
In game one, there was a bit of a scruff at the end of the Oilers/Ducks game, and Getzlaugh was being a bully toward Sekera, a guy smaller than himself and isn't a fighter. In game two, they had Looch out the last minute of play, and strange enough, Getzlaugh didn't make a peep out of him, nor did the rest of his linemates. When Looch is on the ice, he's a bit of a policeman, so to speak. Oh, and I might add that in the first period of the first game of their series, Getzlaugh chopped Looch twice in the back of his legs with his stick, no call. Then another oiler slugged him right after, no call. When Looch retaliated, guess who went to the box for two minutes? Kind of like watching the Bruins/Sens series, in terms of reffing.
It's definitely a penalty since you are always supposed to be in control of your stick. The fact that the play casued an injury si why it got upgraded to a major and game. I don't think it was intentional, I think it was a player bracing him self for contact, Crosby was falling because he clipped skates with Ovechkin, to be honest I think they got this one pretty right. I suppose a case could be made that Ovechkin slashed him and warranted a minor penalty, but those types of calls around the net get let go all the time and I doubt they're giving the Pens a full 2 minute 5 on 3 out of that play.
I feel bad for Sid. I don't feel bad for that organization. They continued to employ and defend pukes like Matt Cooke and Ulf Samuelsson and with a cry-baby at the helm like Mario....yeah, **** 'em.
I am 180 degrees away from you on this. Niskanen WAS punished, he missed almost the entire game on what was a judgement call IMO. It was a hockey play where two guys collided and one got the worst of it. I have seen that happen in games many times and nothing is called if both players get up.
Last I knew, Looch is still in the playoffs? In my post, I discussed several issues going on in the current Oilers/Duck series. Crosby and Ovi, etc, aren't former Bruins, but are discussed in this thread because they are currently playing in the playoffs, right?
Sure he has right to that space- he doesn't have the right to get his head with a crosscheck (again, made the move toward him after Crosby started falling).
Totally agree that it's getting more attention b/c its Crosby, but IMO its a dirtbag play no matter who's on the receiving end (except for Cooke maybe).
I feel bad for Sid. I don't feel bad for that organization. They continued to employ and defend pukes like Matt Cooke and Ulf Samuelsson and with a cry-baby at the helm like Mario....yeah, **** 'em.
I feel bad for Sid. I don't feel bad for that organization. They continued to employ and defend pukes like Matt Cooke and Ulf Samuelsson and with a cry-baby at the helm like Mario....yeah, **** 'em.
I have watched the play many, many times. You have your interpretation and I have mine...and never the two shall meet. I'm not even sure he deserved two minutes, let alone 5 and the game.
I agree with you. Zero premeditation there...that's an instinctive reaction. If you have to give him a penalty for not taking care of his stick around a guy's head then call it a minor or double minor, but 5 and a game was an overreaction. Game misconduct there seems to indicate "intent" to injure, which is a laughable interpretation of that play, IMO.
And I hate the Capitals.