I jut wanted to comment on something towards the end of the last thread concerning Iginla. Hindsight is great, put it is also affected by context. Even for those people (that person, singular?) that did not like the Iggy signing, we have to acknowledge his production. Over the last 2 years, he is 3rd on the team in scoring, as well as 1st in goals. Yes, his defensive play has suffered, but he has produced, and been a leader/mentor for the young ones. And he is now the 4th most expensive forward.
To whine about signing him two years ago because his salary might be getting in the way of what would be our 3rd pairing RD this year, at the cost of significant assets, is completely asinine. Yes, I would like to pick Trouba up. No, I do not want to pay anywhere near what it would cost, because as some point, him playing 3rd pair here wont be good enough for him either, just like WPG...and then those assets were wasted when he walks or demands another trade (and demanding a trade from a second team would absolutely kill any value coming back). Plus what we would have to give up to fit his salary...Iggy in his 3rd year is the only single piece I would be happy about moving. Multiple pieces to make it work, sure...but how does that affect depth, moving say Colborne and Comeau to fit Trouba in makes no sense. Tyutin+Gelinas makes more sense, but only gets you halfway there given that you have to call up a replacement. Tyutin+Mitchell+Colborne/Comeau might work, given cheap replacements for the forwards. But I am leery of the asset cost as well. Best case, Bigras and a 2nd...and I would laugh if that got it done (even though I consider it fair, or even overpayment for him)