Just going to throw this out there...the reason that Peel and Lee (and anyone else you might call out) are notorious/infamous is not necessarily that they are worse at their jobs than any other officials, but that they get more attention for their mistakes.
It's possible that they actually are bad. But it's far more likely that they are, on average, slightly better than other officials, so they get more critical/high-profile game assignments, and because of this their mistakes get blown way out of proportion.
My point is this: Ref A makes 2 mistakes in a Pens-Rangers playoff game on national television. Ref B makes 5 mistakes in an un-televised Coyotes-Panthers exhibition game. Objectively, Ref A is a much better ref than Ref B. But subjectively, the court of public opinion will assume Ref A is horrible because they remember two mistakes.