Hagelin is 24 years old making $2.25M on a 2 year deal and had 24pts last season and 141 games played with 71 pts total if that helps for comparing.
31 goals compared to 16 goals does not make for a similar season.
Hagelin is 24 years old making $2.25M on a 2 year deal and had 24pts last season and 141 games played with 71 pts total if that helps for comparing.
I was told on the main board the other day that to get Landeskog for Henrique it would be Henrique ++ and that Lou would trade Henrique for Lando in an instant.
Their point total was not far off. Parise had 62 points in 82 games, Henrique had 53 in 74. That's like a 4 point difference if Henrique played 82 games.
Landeskog is 3 yrs younger, and has more goals. I think Lou would make that trade without much hesitation.
I was told on the main board the other day that to get Landeskog for Henrique it would be Henrique ++ and that Lou would trade Henrique for Lando in an instant.
4 more goals, big deal. their ceiling is the same exact type of player IMO, and Henrique plays the more difficult position
I am just making a point.
4 more goals and 3 years younger. Guy is 20. And he has not had the luxury of playing with the type of talent Henrique has.
I highly doubt it. Henrique is a known, you know what you have with him.
I did forget how much this place loves young guys.
its almost better to be 18 and unproven than 22 and have proven something
I did forget how much this place loves young guys.
its almost better to be 18 and unproven than 22 and have proven something
nevermind. sorry I brought this up.
Henrique and Landeskog's ceilings are the exact same player. I dont care that one is three freaking years older.
won't talk about it anymore.
Which is clearly why one was a second overall pick and one was a third round pick.
Don't post your opinion on the internet if you aren't open to a discussion/criticism. "Wah! No one agrees with me I'm not talking about it anymore!"
C'mon now.
so now youre bringing up draft position in your argument, but when I brought it up in mine last week when discussing Loktionov it was somehow not valid or relevant?
hm. got it.
Which is clearly why one was a second overall pick and one was a third round pick.
Don't post your opinion on the internet if you aren't open to a discussion/criticism. "Wah! No one agrees with me I'm not talking about it anymore!"
C'mon now.
Also I think it's incredibly convenient to just dismiss Adam's poor year. We're talking 16 points in 42 games no matter how many excuses we want to throw at the wall.
So I bet that's part of the hold up with Adam. Lou isn't going to pay him top-prospect money when he flat-out sucked last year. And I think it's difficult to say we wouldn't move Henrique for someone who was under team control for a few years.
I bet Lou is kicking himself a little bit for not selling high on Adam after putting up 50 points on route to a Calder finalist year.
I did forget how much this place loves young guys.
its almost better to be 18 and unproven than 22 and have proven something
Also I think it's incredibly convenient to just dismiss Adam's poor year. We're talking 16 points in 42 games no matter how many excuses we want to throw at the wall.
So I bet that's part of the hold up with Adam. Lou isn't going to pay him top-prospect money when he flat-out sucked last year. And I think it's difficult to say we wouldn't move Henrique for someone who was under team control for a few years.
I bet Lou is kicking himself a little bit for not selling high on Adam after putting up 50 points on route to a Calder finalist year.
Trading him after the goal that sent us to the SCF? C'mon now.
And as I said in another post, I didn't think he was as bad as some did this past year. He did net 11 goals in 44ish games.
but comparing ceilings to a Landeskog? Nah. Colorado kid certainly has more high end potential and as solid a proven record.