Holtz My Bahls
Registered User
Parise was NEVER going to sign anything but a 1 year bridge deal...NEVER.
That's my point, regardless of the coming off injury, part of that has to set off alarms.
Parise was NEVER going to sign anything but a 1 year bridge deal...NEVER.
Definition of a red flag, no?
And I don't think that is true. Lou just didn't want to pay the exorbitant amount he probably asked for and eventually got in minny.
Definition of a red flag, no?
And I don't think that is true. Lou just didn't want to pay the exorbitant amount he probably asked for and eventually got in minny.
Too bad Horton had a great playoffs and is going to command god knows how much now :why:
Actually, that's a great thing. Otherwise there was virtually no chance of Boston letting him walk. Now it might be a bit more difficult for them to afford him given their soon to be free agents.
I don't think Parise was much of a loss at all in terms of where the team should spend its payroll (towards the defense). In terms of offensive production Parise hasn't reached 70 pts in 3 years and his career point production is a 60 pt player. His playoff stats are dismal and are at the production rate of a 50 pt player.
You can't fault Lou for using common sense and realizing that Parise at even somewhere close to the price of what Minnesota was paying would hurt the franchise for years and years. In fact you can say Lou is an absolute genius in that he predicted this possibility years before, picked up Kovalchuk, and not only paid the same that he would have got for Parise but he actually got a franchise player. People complain that as a result of getting Kovalchuk we had to let Parise go. That was the good part about the whole thing. The team no longer needed Parise so there was no chance of overpaying him and the team got Kovalchuk so they could wisely spend their money on improving the team in other ways.
It's scary to think where this franchise would be if Lou was forced to resign Parise at his demand because the team lacked depth.
The problem there isn't the amount of money spent, it's what the money is spent on.I'm sorry if I misunderstood you, but you think we should spend our payroll towards defense?
We already have TOO MUCH money invested in the defense. Over $10 million a year in Salvador, Volchenkov, and Tallinder.
The problem there isn't the amount of money spent, it's what the money is spent on.
He also traded him for nothing. He got a fourth for his rights. Who is Lou going to deal that realistically has that kind of value - Elias and Clarkson? Elias has a chance to stay even if he gets to July 5. Clarkson not so much so but who freaking cares about a fourth-rounder anyway? The chance of those players coming back is worth more than a fourth-rounder.
In the Isles' case there was no chance of Streit coming back since they didn't want to go over x number of years/dollars, or he flat told them he wasn't coming back regardless. Usually with our FA's, Lou will let them get their value and come back to him with the offer. That's why he'll never trade a guy's rights, even someone like Gomez who was 99% gone.
I don't think Parise was much of a loss at all in terms of where the team should spend its payroll (towards the defense). In terms of offensive production Parise hasn't reached 70 pts in 3 years and his career point production is a 60 pt player. His playoff stats are dismal and are at the production rate of a 50 pt player.
You can't fault Lou for using common sense and realizing that Parise at even somewhere close to the price of what Minnesota was paying would hurt the franchise for years and years. In fact you can say Lou is an absolute genius in that he predicted this possibility years before, picked up Kovalchuk, and not only paid the same that he would have got for Parise but he actually got a franchise player. People complain that as a result of getting Kovalchuk we had to let Parise go. That was the good part about the whole thing. The team no longer needed Parise so there was no chance of overpaying him and the team got Kovalchuk so they could wisely spend their money on improving the team in other ways.
It's scary to think where this franchise would be if Lou was forced to resign Parise at his demand because the team lacked depth.
That's what I'm saying. That's too much for those guys.
I'm glad we didn't sign Parise to a huge contract, but you're aware that the Devils made a mega offer that wasn't too far off from Minnesota's, right?
He's saying that you can spend that amount on D and not have it be an issue, it's just we spent the money on players we don't really need on this team anymore.
I'm sorry if I misunderstood you, but you think we should spend our payroll towards defense?
We already have TOO MUCH money invested in the defense. Over $10 million a year in Salvador, Volchenkov, and Tallinder.
The Devils NEVER missed the playoffs with Parise in the lineup....
I'm glad we didn't sign Parise to a huge contract, but you're aware that the Devils made a mega offer that wasn't too far off from Minnesota's, right?
The deals were really far off. Lou didn't come close to 44m in the first 4 years and nor should he have.
Did the team want Parise back? Yes. Did the team need Parise with Kovalchuk? Absolutely not.
The Devils NEVER missed the playoffs with Parise in the lineup....
The Devils never missed the playoffs with Mike Mottau and Johnny Oduya in the lineup