I don't think you get any points for Lassinanti then although we'll have to wait for the official scoring. I would assume Lundstrom would get the win in the shootout although he's not currently getting credit for a win either.I'm not sure how to count the Sweden win. Lassinanti was in for 65 minutes but Lundstrom took over in the shootout.
At any rate, HUGE game by Rielly and Scheifele tonight. All my Finns got blanked, but I'm still ahead with 20 points. Woot!
I don't think you get any points for Lassinanti then although we'll have to wait for the official scoring. I would assume Lundstrom would get the win in the shootout although he's not currently getting credit for a win either.
Goals don't count in the shootout but given that the game was a tie heading into the shootout, I just can't see any way Lassinanti would get credit for the win.Gibson didn't finish his game (USA 8-0 vs. Germany) but he still gets credit for the win, no?
Sorry to throw a live one at you there, SK13... hehe.
Lassinanti didn't lose the game and "finished" the 65 minutes game. We all know the shootout is a theatrical endeavor. That's why goals don't count when scored in them.
I think I should be given the points after the Rielly mishap.
Goals don't count in the shootout but given that the game was a tie heading into the shootout, I just can't see any way Lassinanti would get credit for the win.
Gibson got credit for the win because he was the "goalie of record" when he left the game with the lead (similar to baseball with a starting pitcher). I would assume Lundstrom will get the win but who knows.
I'm not seeing a win column for goalie statistics on the IIHF site. Am I blind?
did everyone send Cerebral the 5 g's we agreed on?
http://stats.worldjunior2013.com/Hydra/306/IHM3060SWE_83_2_0.pdf
Bottom right hand corner.
If the team isnt ahead when the goalie leaves, I dont see how he gets credit for a win. I think Cerebral is correct.
Ah hah! I am blind...
I am just getting screwed left right and center. I still maintain I should get at minimum 1 point, if not 2.
I'm not in the pool (so why am I here butting in and putting in my 2 cents?... because I ****ing want to that's why. )... but just some friendly advice from past pools I've been in... just count the disputed goalies points and put an asterisk beside it. Usually in a pool it's not even a problem when the final point count is done so it's not worth arguing over now... if it does produce a difference in the standings... there are usually better final stats at the end of the tournament anyway.
I don't think he gets the win.... because he was not part of the win. he was part of a tie.
That's my personal opinion.
I do agree that you got screwed on the Rielly non-assist, but you and Lakai can duke it out for that point, since then we would have to take a point from RNH that didn't exist either (I'm just answering to it because you brought it up in another comment).
Just my two cents.
I don't think I'm winning this pool anytime soon. My D is terrible, and other than Strome, Rattie and Drouin, and maybe Yarulin, I made some terrible picks.
Oh well. Always next year!
take a look at my d
I think the one point is fair. A win makes no sense because he didn't win but zero points doesn't make sense either.Sigarev injured and Zharkov capitalizes as his replacement on the top line. Rakell not Rakelling up the points (1 assist in every games he's played) and apparently shuffled to a secondary scoring line. Lassinanti didn't start (backup started the 2nd half of the back-to-back today). Pretty lackluster day for me.
I changed the scoring from the Lassinanti SO-pull to an OT Loss for 1 point.