OMG67
Registered User
- Sep 1, 2013
- 10,790
- 8,936
So defensive again and missing the point and exaggerating / altering what is being said, over and over, now belittling. Taking away opportunities systematically with selfish / corrupt / lazy practices from when kids start (at mass scale) removes ones with great potential left undeveloped, this is just one last time for some. Your self-serving #"s are meaningless. As yes, most do may not come back rejuvenated in u18 etc. when rejected so unjustly again, with self-righteous scouts and paid for player reviews / rankings which lazy scouts use when not bothering to take time for those lower on their potential curve and putting up lower points, but still very good for their situation and opportunities (ice time, little to no power play etc.) Unbiased statistics from vision software will soon be used and negate the bias, providing incredible statistics on everything from play with and without the puck, defensive and offense skills throughout games, everything from takeaways, opposition shut down, pass aim, speed, completion, skating acceleration, IQ, (options available vs chosen) etc. etc., then the archaic and corrupt practices will be gone. It will be fair, impartial and adjust to whom a player is against on each play. Then likely a case like Konnor Smith would be validated by these statistics and prove their worth / effectiveness, as there are different types of players, and roles that aide in a team being successful. Though don’t think he would get drafted this year. Though surely, you'll tell me this will never happen even though it's well on its way.
If AI can truly create metrics based on vision software and it then can be used as a tool in the overall toolbox then I agree. But, the reality is the AI tools can only go so far. But, like you said, it would at least provide the opportunity to create a more even playing field for evaluation. The intangibles are where you need humans assessing. I’m not sure AI could properly assess the intangibles.