Well, what kinds of conclusions do you draw from Ron Howell's comments in that article Hv?....
1) Salary of $8500 while generous enough essentially eaten up due to the high cost of living in NYC or environs.
2) Travel with 70 games (35 road) not only grueling but exhausting. A "lifestyle" not a "profession" nor a "job". All consuming. And at the end of the season? You HAVE to work. Swingin a shovel, pick axe... factory... about all they could get.
3) Loss of control over ones destiny. You could be sent down, traded... some of clearly NHL caliber instead opted to play out their careers in the old WHL, the Q, Semi-Pro Senior etc. $$$ just as good (better paid in some cases). Control over your life, where you lived.
.... all kinds of reasons, could go on & on.... so no, its not surprising that talent be it of Swedish, Finnish, Canadian or American or whatever origin opted to play an entirely different sport professionally whereby the money was just as good if not better; allowed them to pursue outside interests... still allowed them to play decent level of hockey at home while raising a family, in Howells case, working with his father in the families fur business.... the positives he mentioned, "playing with his brother" & the "pension"... the former, absolutely that wouldve been great however as a Ranger, youd never be Playoff Bound. No Bonuses.... And as for the then much vaunted "NHL Pension"?. I had to laugh at that comment. Not a nice laugh either. Pretty despicable & his comments speaking to just how naive' the players were but then cant blame them, no one thought the NHL's owners etc could possibly be that bent... Saved himself a lot of grief over that scam. Absolutely criminal what the NHL pulled on the players from 1947 on through the 70's.