GDT: #19 - 11/15/17 | RANGERS @ blackhawks | 8:00 - NBCSN

[nevesis]

Wow, other goalies have pucks that squeak through? Imagine that...

 

[5 4 Fighting]

Nasher!

 

[Griffinbw]

I like what Pittsburgh plays too, surprised when I noticed.

Im noticing a theme here of which playlists we notice...

 

[Larrybiv]

Staal needed to CRUSH his old buddy AA right there.

 

[ReggieDunlop68]

NON butt move fast break. I’ll take it.

 

[mike14]

Never scores in a breakaway....

 

[LeetchisGod]

I take back what I said about Nash on breakaways

That was the exception not the rule.

 

[Machinehead]

Oh great now he thinks hes a goal scorer again and wont pass

He is a goal scorer

 

[2Leetch_94]

Nash breaking in on the goalie might be the least dangerous chance in hockey.

Ultimate jinx activated. I give you credit for that goal.

 

[aufheben]

Did that just really happen?

 

[Crease]

The key for Nash is to aim a bit left of wide.

 

[NewLife]

f*** yaaeh. That coffee made me pumed as a mf. They better win this cuz I won't fall asleep until 10 in the morning.

 

[RangerLifer]

I take back what I said about Nash on breakaways

It worked as a reverse jinx!

 

[Doctyl]

Wow, other goalies have pucks that squeak through? Imagine that...

Other goalies have sv% above .900? Imagine that

 

[PlamsUnlimited]

Talk more shit about Nash it makes him play better

it is the magic

 

[mrhockey193195]

I rear ended you but I had the intent to brake.

Not sure how you can compare driving a car with playing a hockey game. Your analogy doesn't work here. I hope I don't even need to get into why.

Also, using an injured player example is a whole different ballgame.

Isn't that making a rule for the exception though? It's not often goalies get knocked out by a shot

The injury example was intentionally extreme. The same would apply if the goalie lost his mask, or the goalie covered the puck.

I think a decent analogy is if a team enters the zone offside and immediately rips a slap shot that goes in before the linesman can blow the whistle. Just because the puck entered the net before the whistle was blown doesn't mean it should count.

I think by and large people hate "intent to blow the whistle" because there is a large amount of ref-specific subjectivity to it. That, I agree with, and can be frustrating. But the rule itself I think is fine.

 

[haveandare]

That was a real good read by Nash to take off for that puck when he did.

 

[Hi ImHFNYR]

If Hank gave up that terrible goal that we just scored we'd still have the usual suspects looking to blame everything and everyone else possible. I just read 6 pages of passive aggressive nonsense where, as per usual, the GDT gets hijacked by the never ending quest to pretend like only two or three posters know the TRUE way to analyze goaltending and hockey in general.

 

[ReggieDunlop68]

Oh look, control on the initial stop!

Pavelic, you visionary!

He must rested from the second period.

 

[Griffinbw]

2 on 1 Kampfer back. Thank god for offsides

 

[trilobyte]

Crazed wide open game

 

[DanielBrassard]

Come on Zib, how do you flub that.

 

[Machinehead]

Can Shattenkirk just like, never leave the ice?

 

[Pavel Buchnevich]

Staal had no offensive involvement in that play, and created an odd man rush for Chicago because he couldn't position himself there.

 

[Griffinbw]

Staal had no offensive involvement in that play, and created an odd man rush for Chicago because he couldn't position himself there.

Welcome to NY

 

[NCRanger]

Wow, other goalies have pucks that squeak through? Imagine that...

Yeah, and it was a bad goal.