He had control of the puck you can do thatYeah idk what yall saw but that was off...
He literally put both skates over before the puck entered.
Back to shitting on him. 6M and he doesn't know what offside is?
That's not the rule - he can precede the puck with control.Yeah idk what yall saw but that was off...
He literally put both skates over before the puck entered.
Back to shitting on him. 6M and he doesn't know what offside is?
We already knew you were a casual.I don't know what to think of that to be honest. I'm not going to pretend as if I know the rules. Lol
Is that not still deemed control though?That's not the rule - he can precede the puck with control.
The issue is he had basically passed it but it was close.
I've always been a shitposter first, hockey fan second.We already knew you were a casual.
He had control head down puck was within his reach. Point did the same shit at an earlier game and it was a good goal then and it’s a good goal now.Is that not still deemed control though?
It is not. If Cirelli went for the puck instead of going for Letang's stick. They would probably have called it a good goalIs that not still deemed control though?
In the end I would've called it offside but I missed the memo on why. That automatically makes me eligible to be a ref. Call it, have no idea why.Honestly, the league could easily solve this shit by just having the ref explain in like 15 seconds why they made the decision they did. We won't have to agree, but at least we would know where they are coming from.
And they call that, but none of the other things that Pittsburgh did in the last 3 minutes?
They beta-tested this for a short period, for some reason it didn't stick.Honestly, the league could easily solve this shit by just having the ref explain in like 15 seconds why they made the decision they did. We won't have to agree, but at least we would know where they are coming from.
And they call that, but none of the other things that Pittsburgh did in the last 3 minutes?