Larmer83
I'm taking the high road moving forward.
Now is as good as any time.This team continues to be a dumpster fire. At what point is Davidson looked at?
Now is as good as any time.This team continues to be a dumpster fire. At what point is Davidson looked at?
For me, it will depend on what he does during the off-season. If his does another buy and flip type off-season, I am going to be pissed and ready for him to move on from the Hawks. But should he actually acquire legitimately NHL talent (and hire a legitimately good HC), I'd give him another year or so.This team continues to be a dumpster fire. At what point is Davidson looked at?
Lol people continue to be surprised this team sucks. Bottom of the barrel rosters become bottom of the barrel teams.
It's a rebuild, a long, long process. It will be closer to 2030 before this teams shows major life and becomes competitive. If you cant wait, may as well stop watching now.
What decisions did Davidson make that is going to cost the team in the long run? Yeah the FAs aren't good at the moment but it they're allowing the kids to develop in Rockford and they're gonna be gone and off the books after next year anyway. It's not like any of them are keeping the Hawks from signing anyone.That is BS as this team is worse than last year at this point despite the offseason additions and stated goal of improvement in roster. Davidson made some bad decisions this past summer and his 1st coaching hire failed miserably
And a proper rebuild would not see Joey f***ing Anderson playing over guys like Dach or Slaggert on NHL roster or actively look to block kids from making team
If 7 years after drafting Bedard is your timeline for competitive team that is not a good rebuild model and only ensures Bedard will be looking to Eichel himself out of Chicago by then
How many playoff series wins did Edmonton have in 6/7 years? How many Did Toronto have? Colorado after getting Mackinnon? Tampa from Stamkos/Hedman, actually they have 1 year in contrast. Even Mario Lemieux only had 1 playoff appearance his first 6 years. Florida Panthers? After Ekblad-Barkov... 7 years....I cant imagine defending this and saying this should take 7+ years. That is completely absurd.
As this goes on, and this team not only doesn't improve, but regresses further down the toilet.... Kyle Davidson looks more and more like Rick Hahn and Ryan Poles.
Most of your examples were top heavy--the young star players still could make plays and learn on the fly yet the depth needed to compete for a playoff run wasn't there. I don't remember Stamkos, Mackinnon, Crosby, or Barkov constantly chasing the puck in their own zone or getting swarmed in the offensive zone to the point where it was hard to evaluate any progress. Were any of them thrown in with a bunch of plugs like this roster, or did they have at least a decent line to play on that was able to provide some help?How many playoff series wins did Edmonton have in 6/7 years? How many Did Toronto have? Colorado after getting Mackinnon? Tampa from Stamkos/Hedman, actually they have 1 year in contrast. Even Mario Lemieux only had 1 playoff appearance his first 6 years. Florida Panthers? After Ekblad-Barkov... 7 years....
If you don't think EVERY tank should and will have to take 7 plus years to be a contender, you don't follow the trends very well. You obviously don't want to be Buffalo/Arizona, but if you think a smart good rebuild is being a contender before 7 years, I think you're too impatient or pipe-dreaming.
A rarity of saying Tampa had that 1 run early in Stamkos/Hedman's career in 10/11? otherwise it was 6/7 years from their draft in 2015. A rare kind of exception in the routine. The difference, maybe because they never got rid of St. Louis & Levacavier who still carried those teams. (I was always pro keeping Kane for this rebuild, even over Debrincat)
(I never counted our former Hawks, because we know we weren't tanking. If anything, trading Chelios was a rebuild sign or letting Amonte walk, Still that was mainly Writz being cheap, he was never not trying to be good, just being cheap. I put the Pens in that zone too, they were cheap & struggling to stay alive as a team, not intentionally changing.)
Barkov, Mackinnion, struggled like that for 4 years, yeah I always went on to the point that Bedard was joining at a bad time for this rebuild. Not you were going to say no or, you play somewhere else last year. It just wasn't a good timing fit. Mack didn't reallyMost of your examples were top heavy--the young star players still could make plays and learn on the fly yet the depth needed to compete for a playoff run wasn't there. I don't remember Stamkos, Mackinnon, Crosby, or Barkov constantly chasing the puck in their own zone or getting swarmed in the offensive zone to the point where it was hard to evaluate any progress. Were any of them thrown in with a bunch of plugs like this roster, or did they have at least a decent line to play on that was able to provide some help?
I get your point, but your first 2 referenced examples are probably reasons not to do a total rebuild...more so than examples of how long it should take. Toronto and Edmonton are generally ridiculed for doing a poor job building around their young stars.How many playoff series wins did Edmonton have in 6/7 years? How many Did Toronto have? Colorado after getting Mackinnon? Tampa from Stamkos/Hedman, actually they have 1 year in contrast. Even Mario Lemieux only had 1 playoff appearance his first 6 years. Florida Panthers? After Ekblad-Barkov... 7 years....
If you don't think EVERY tank should and will have to take 7 plus years to be a contender, you don't follow the trends very well. You obviously don't want to be Buffalo/Arizona, but if you think a smart good rebuild is being a contender before 7 years, I think you're too impatient or pipe-dreaming.
A rarity of saying Tampa had that 1 run early in Stamkos/Hedman's career in 10/11? otherwise it was 6/7 years from their draft in 2015. A rare kind of exception in the routine. The difference, maybe because they never got rid of St. Louis & Levacavier who still carried those teams. (I was always pro keeping Kane for this rebuild, even over Debrincat)
(I never counted our former Hawks, because we know we weren't tanking. If anything, trading Chelios was a rebuild sign or letting Amonte walk, Still that was mainly Writz being cheap, he was never not trying to be good, just being cheap. I put the Pens in that zone too, they were cheap & struggling to stay alive as a team, not intentionally changing.)
This.Lol people continue to be surprised this team sucks. Bottom of the barrel rosters become bottom of the barrel teams.
It's a rebuild, a long, long process. It will be closer to 2030 before this teams shows major life and becomes competitive. If you cant wait, may as well stop watching now.
Completely ridiculous. So Bedard should go the first 7 years of his career before the team becomes competitive?Lol people continue to be surprised this team sucks. Bottom of the barrel rosters become bottom of the barrel teams.
It's a rebuild, a long, long process. It will be closer to 2030 before this teams shows major life and becomes competitive. If you cant wait, may as well stop watching now.
To be fair, it took the Oilers 7 years with McDavid before they made it to the conference finals, and that year they got swept against the Avs in the WCFs.Completely ridiculous. So Bedard should go the first 7 years of his career before the team becomes competitive?
What makes baby Smurf Strome special compared to guys like Lemieux and MacKinnon?Completely ridiculous. So Bedard should go the first 7 years of his career before the team becomes competitive?
Getting to the final 4 is more than competitiveTo be fair, it took the Oilers 7 years with McDavid before they made it to the conference finals, and that year they got swept against the Avs in the WCFs.
Getting to the CFs is competitive, I agree.Getting to the final 4 is more than competitive
While rebuilding it means being tough to play against. Everyone wants to cite pre-2010--it was obvious that team was going to be tough to play against regardless of whether 2009 or 2010 ended in the first round or they won the Cup. There's no timeline, but it all starts with being tough to play against, making the opposing goalie work and the other team knowing they had to earn the result and not looking at the Blackhawks on the schedule and preparing as if it's a day off.Getting to the CFs is competitive, I agree.
I would argue, though, that a 1st round or 2nd round exit isn't.
Really just depends on what you think "competitive" means.
Second round exit is a top 8 team out of 32. That’s competitive.Getting to the CFs is competitive, I agree.
I would argue, though, that a 1st round or 2nd round exit isn't.
Really just depends on what you think "competitive" means.