I got ran the Riot Act in another forum over 2 years ago for making the same suggestion I am going to make now. It finally seems everyone recognizes Holland is out of his depth in the cap era. When he had the ability to throw around more money (twice as much as a lot of teams) than any other GM, in the days the Wings were the Yankees of Hockey, he was able to appear as a superior GM. Of course this was prior to needing to develop our own player's QUICKLY, draft consistently well (remove Håkan Andersson and Detroit drafted pretty bad during the Holland era) and make sensible contract offers. This is where Holland is at his worst. He needs to go. It's time. It was time 3 years ago. I don't see it happening until the season is over, at best.
I have considered Blashill one of the worst coaches in the NHL since he was considered for the job. He's bad with veterans, and even worse with young players. If they had the option, the players we have that are currently considered the future of the Red Wings would bolt. AA is a perfect example. He already tried. And one of his main reasons is lack of playtime.
Blashill's tendency of continuously giving roster spots and more minutes over the last 3 seasons to players like Ott, Miller, Wilson, Booth, Richards, Erickson, the list goes on and on. First over Larkin. Then AA, Mantha and Frk. And now Svechnikov, Hronek, Saarijarvi, Rasmussen, Cholo, and even Givanni Smith (yes I realize he is not ready, may never be) just using him to make a point. The NHL, because of the salary cap, requires younger players to make the jump earlier than in the past. And Detroit (I assume this is also a Holland philosophy) is notorious for keeping young players down longer than other franchises. But the entire thought process of keeping young players down because there more likely to make mistakes than veteran players is something that has gone by the way side for the most part since the cap era began.
It actually only has a place if the team in question is a legitimate Stanley Cup contender. If not, then why did it matter keeping Mantha down an entire extra year, so those minutes could go to Steve Ott? At least Mantha presented the chance of doing something that might help you win, as well as acclimating him to the NHL sooner. Same with AA. Why did minutes continue to go to Drew Miller even after we were eliminated from the playoffs. Its just stupid thinking.
We are not a contender. Who gives a crap if we can possibly be good enough to get eliminated in the first round of the playoffs? It's either Stanley Cup Contender, or not! I'm in no way stating the younger players I mentioned would come in and turn this train wreck around. Not at all. But at least we'd see what we may really have in Rasmussen and Svechnicov. And can anyone argue that just trying some of our young defenseman could he much worse than what were seeing now?
The only team in the NHL that seems to have a rule that players must be 23 years old or older for their rookie season is the Detroit Red Wings. I know the only reason my interest in the Red Wings has increased is because of the fact that Mantha, Larkin and AA are finally considered the go to guys. Yet important minutes, game on the line minutes, still seem to be funneled off to Nyquist, Tatar and Abdelkader to often.
Blashill should be fired before our next game. As soon as Bert has His conditioning up to par he should be brought up, as should Svechnicov, Rasmussen and Cholo. Id actually love to see our top 3 Defenseman prospects come up and take a ride. What's it gonna hurt? Although I won't go as far as to say bring up Keith Petruzzelli. Don't wanna ruin the guy before he gets a chance to give it a go.
Too many minutes are going to ineffective players. Out of fear of making more mistakes. And this has been going on for several years while players with some potential either move on to other organizations or just sit and wait until they're in their early twenties before they're given a chance. And honestly why?