orangecrush8
Registered User
Completely agree on Garland. Felt like he was creating all night.On the Canucks side I didn’t really notice Pettersson at all. Thought Connor Garland looked like the most dangerous forward
Completely agree on Garland. Felt like he was creating all night.On the Canucks side I didn’t really notice Pettersson at all. Thought Connor Garland looked like the most dangerous forward
A little disingenuous to highlight that the Flyers have tons of talent on the roster because they have 15 first-rounders, including Johnson.
He was a little jittery the first period, but most of his struggles were just adjusting to smaller windows and faster players, KHL to preseason to regular season.Flyers have exciting youth and don't have to fear shootouts like plague!? What universe is this!?
@CanadianFlyer88 , yeah, I did not torture myself w watching this. Not that much about Šilovs, but am bit ill (have been off ever since Prague). There's Flyers matinee in 2 weeks, will save my excitement for that [: Life is hard as European NHL fan over 30
From what I understand, Michkov had flashes of brilliance but in general seemed rather nervous? If this counts as his ''down day'' we'll all take it
Zamula is locked in. He is Michkov and Fedotov’s translator on the bench.17 the only thing I had a problem with, was him late getting back to stop his man on the 2nd Van goal. He immediately got coaching on the bench, he will learn. As far as rest of game, he needs to feel his way and get acclimated to the speed of NHL. His first game everyone needs relax.
The worst player was
Zamula he should be sent down a turnover machine.
He was a little jittery the first period, but most of his struggles were just adjusting to smaller windows and faster players, KHL to preseason to regular season.
But that adjustment took all of two periods, by the third period he was playing with confidence - the biggest problem is similar to playing with an elite point guard in basketball - his teammates have to get used to passes arriving before they usually expect - because he sees them coming open before they realize they are.
As far as Luchanko, I can see why they fell in love with him, right now he's still operating more on instincts, but broke up a number of plays in the D-zone, other than one glaring mistake, seemed like he belonged on the ice. Better center than Couts or Poehling. And looked really good on the PP, probably b/c right now the extra space lets him use his passing skills, whereas 5x5 he's still trying to figure out how to make plays.
Brink? I thought he was awful except for the pass to Farabee to Foerster on the PP.Only two things I noticed last night was Brink looked good and Ersson looked good. No one else really stood out either way but the team as a whole played well. Still a possibility for 81-0-1!
I'm a Kings fan living in Vancouver and the sole reason I went was to watch Michkov live. You guys got a stud on your hands.
Foerster was a pleasant surprise
But, but he's big and slow and plays the "Flyers way."Foerster has been flying under the radar but he's real good
He belongs if you want to pigeon hole him and don't want his offense to develop.
Flyers had more shots on goal but Van outchanced them handily.How many even strength shots did Vancouver have? In the period I saw they didn’t seem to generate much pressure 5 on 5.
I agree with everything else you listed for Luchanko, but this one stat doesn't feel correct based on my viewing. It prompted me to check the NHL app and that is showing 33% from the dot, which does feels very correct. Unless you are specifically saying he was 50% on D-Zone faceoffs, in which case there is a chance your stat is correct and I don't really use the stats sites that check thatLuchanko - I actually thought had some good moments. I never once thought he was out of place. Won 2 d zone faceoffs, I believe went 50% on the dot.
It's common sense that a guy just drafted who was a PPG player, could grow the offensive side of his game much more in Jr. In the NHL he will play to not make mistakes for fear of being sent down.Isn’t this pigeon holing him to say he can only develop one way?
I think Luchanko was 2/2 in the dzone. One was after an icing, the other I can't remember.I agree with everything else you listed for Luchanko, but this one stat doesn't feel correct based on my viewing. It prompted me to check the NHL app and that is showing 33% from the dot, which does feels very correct. Unless you are specifically saying he was 50% on D-Zone faceoffs, in which case there is a chance your stat is correct and I don't really use the stats sites that check that