Dipsy Doodle
Rent A Barn
- May 28, 2006
- 76,650
- 21,168
I would do it at this point. As much as I hate that extra year and 500k isn't much cap hit savings, I am so done with Loui now after his comments in the summer. Problem is Loui's NTC is hanging up everything from the sounds of it.Eriksson for Ladd straight up?
any reason why it would be a 3 team trade and not just between two of them?Three team traded involving Eriksson, Ryan and Ladd?
any reason why it would be a 3 team trade and not just between two of them?
It's just that the more complexity you add to a trade proposal, the less likely it is. So if Ladd goes to Vancouver, would the Isles so much prefer Ryan over Eriksson? If they would, then for sure, a three team trade might be the best, but I don't see why they'd prefer Ryan so much.What do you mean? In this scenario Ladd likely goes to Vancouver, Ryan to the NYI and Eriksson to Ottawa.
So Van willing to pay a first to get rid of him?
It's just that the more complexity you add to a trade proposal, the less likely it is. So if Ladd goes to Vancouver, would the Isles so much prefer Ryan over Eriksson? If they would, then for sure, a three team trade might be the best, but I don't see why they'd prefer Ryan so much.
The buyout for Lucic isLol wut? I’ll take talking out of my ass without checking facts for $500 Alex!
Lucic buyout next summer is 6years compared to 4 for eriksson. Lucic cap hit over the next 6 years after the buyout is over 14M. Erikssons is over 10M. Even if you take the last 2 years of lucic’s buyout out to make them the same 4 years, Lucic’s Buyout is over 13M over that 4 years. Yes erikssons buyout is a 1M higher for year 1 and marginally higher year 2, there’s a huge difference of 4M for year 3 and then year 4 erikssons is marginally higher and then done whereas Lucic has 2 more years of almost 500k. And that’s only because of the retention.
I don't think you'd win that poll based on buyouts todays, it gets even uglier for you on buyouts at next years window.The buyout for Lucic is
3.2
4.9
3.6
4.9
.5
.5
.5
.5
Eriksson's is
5.5
5.5
3.5
.6
.6
.6
Those 2 years of 5.5 are very tough to swallow. The Lucic buyout pushes the additional year of 4.9 four years down the road. When you're talking cap, the big issues are: delaying and total amount.
Umm, yeah.Team wanna get rid of an horrible contract
MORE NEWS AT 6!!!!!!11!1
At this point there isn’t much to be done. Loan him to the Texas Stars and buy him out in two years. Sucks for all parties but what can you do.
Both are pretty awful contracts that cannot be bought out, so it's a moot point.I don't think you'd win that poll based on buyouts todays, it gets even uglier for you on buyouts at next years window.
Umm, yeah.
Thanks for your useful contribution to the thread.
No way he retires until after he collects his signing bonus, prior to the last year of his contract.Send him to Utica, healthy scratch every game. By year two he'll probably retire.
THANK YOU for saying this.It's insane how awful the Nucks are at cap management:
They're a rebuilding team, with lots of their top talent on rookie deals, and they're still in cap hell because they give out non-stop terrible contracts to scrubs. The above 7 players are costing them over $28 mil in cap hit, most of that locked in for 3+ years, and the only one who's deserves more than about $1.5 mil/year is Myers. They're paying replacement level players like core pieces, and didn't even save enough $$ to sign a true core piece in Boeser.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Player AAV Years Remaining Loui Eriksson $6 mil 3 Tyler Myers $6 mil 5 Brandon Sutter $4.375 mil 2 Tanner Pearson $3.75 mil 2 Antoine Roussel $3 mil 3 Jay Beagle $3 mil 3 Tim Schaller $1.9 mil 1
I really like Vancouver's young talent (Pettersson, Boeser, Horvat, Hughes, Demko, Podkolzin, etc.), but they need to get rid of Benning SO badly. It's inexcusable for a rebuilding team to be locked into cap hell for the next 3 years due to consistently overpaying scrubs like crazy.
Make sure his roommate on the road snores.Send him to Utica, healthy scratch every game. By year two he'll probably retire.
And has a flatulence problem.Make sure his roommate on the road snores.
Whatever.I’m not the one that interrupted an actual discussion with a pointless post.Yours was one for the living too