Boston Bruins ‘22-‘23 Bruins roster and trade proposals discussions. IV

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,473
4,844
I’m a baseball and football guy - so excuse my ignorance not thinking Zacha is a one hit wonder.

His vision and ability to play with skill is Debruskish level
Don't apologize for being a football, baseball guy you know more than some of these so called hockey experts .............Stats are not everything but 50 pts is pretty good that means 5o times the puck went in the net and it does not matter who put it in . Your vision is fine he is he has played some solid all around hockey this year , now the contract talks will be a different matter...........
Sure but I see almost no chance they could get both.

Shoot one of those and a complimentary depth piece would be pretty phenomenal.
You are spot on they are not getting both ,but I have been wrong many times before . My preference and have stated many times is defenseman..........If I had a preference and had to overpay for a forward Timo Meier is my choice .............
 
  • Like
Reactions: HustleB and DKH

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,319
24,244
Trade Grizz for a 1st
Package that 1st , Bruins 1st, Lohrie and Smith for Chychrun .
Win Stanley Cup.
Profit

I'm not against Chychrun but this is an interesting article about what type of player Chychrun actually is.


Seems like the consensus is he's basically an offensive puck-mover who has his warts on the defensive side of the puck, despite his size and strength.
 

HumBucker

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 7, 2005
13,725
7,053
Toronto
Sitting behind net at ice level for two periods the Bruins defend and being a long time coach for defenseman - I love watching how these guys react to pressure, retrieve pucks, breakout. I’m on the right post so I can hone in on McAvoy & Carlo and it’s been a joy. Carlo and Lindholm are elite. Brandon looks like a different guy this year.

Grzelcyk has as good a stick and anticipation as anyone. It’s to bad he’s not 6’2” and I wouldn’t have to read so many shitty comments

Clifton is a nice third pair and hopefully gets paid somewhere - not sure they can fit him in unfortunately and he’s not what I want as a shutdown guy
Good observations. Thoughts on Forbort?
 

DKH

Worst Poster/Awful Takes
Feb 27, 2002
76,680
57,745
Good observations. Thoughts on Forbort?
He’s a useful club in the bag

Very good PK and shot blocker but he’s more physical than I thought

When I used to take my kid to Manchester games he was a favorite of hers / and the Darla basset hound thing; teammates love him

Bottom pair who has specific skill set

If you need a bottom 6 guy who’s got those skills a good teammate I’m all in

I do not like him as a top 4 - above his skillset

Quicker than last year.
We were saying that a couple of months ago at game - moving better
 
  • Like
Reactions: HumBucker

JOKER 192

Blow it up
Jun 14, 2010
20,511
20,253
Montreal,Canada
I'm not against Chychrun but this is an interesting article about what type of player Chychrun actually is.


Seems like the consensus is he's basically an offensive puck-mover who has his warts on the defensive side of the puck, despite his size and strength.
Interesting, I was thinking offense in acquiring him.

We do need to consider a few things.

He does play for one of the perennial worst teams in the league and that will influence the stats.

Bruins could really use a few goals from the back end , that could put them over the top. Jacob could be that guy.

Now I'm trading to replace Grizz , he can play a heavy game, is excellent in zone entries, with Fobbort and Lindholm on the left, he is not required to play PK .
He will add 40 PPS over what Grizz can bring.

He may not be the perfect fit in Edmonton because they need someone to keep pucks out of their net. We can keep pucks out of our net.

Look at Lindholm's numbers compared to when he was in Anaheim. I suspect it wouldn't hurt Chychrun's numbers playing with the Bruins.
 

SPLBRUIN

Registered User
Mar 21, 2010
12,332
12,505
While I’m a fan of Zacha I’m not sure I’d be ready to sign him to a much bigger contract next season. He’s currently on pace to score 11G 39A 50PTS, his current cap hit is 3.5m. What’s a fair contrast assuming he’s scoring at a similar pace the next few seasons? 4.5m per? 5?

I think you are forgetting that he is doing this with very little PP time while also moving up and down the lineup playing all 3 forward position's. With regular PP time his numbers would be far above what they are now.
 

Over the volcano

Registered User
Mar 10, 2006
35,252
20,768
Watertown
I just don’t see how they can sign Zacha unless he’s a last resort type deal next season

Zacha is pretty much guaranteed to me gone unless the bruins whiff on centers and zacha is a last resort. If frederic and Clifton want to keep taking near minimum they can stay or else theyll probably be cap casualties as well.


You do not want Zacha as a #2 center. Excellent third liner, but hell no to him being an 2nd line guy of the future.
He's a 25 year old 2nd line jack of all trades. Nothinhg spectacular, maybe just a complimentary piece but surely valuable.

They're clearing 11 million upfront between Foglino, Smith, Wagner and Nosek.
 

JoeIsAStud

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
12,696
7,218
Visit site
Since Gryzlyk doesn't have huge stats I think we might extend him in line with his current cap hit this offseason. The team mutinied when Butch scratched him last year is what it is.

I wouldn't be shocked if the Clifton replacement is... Mike Reilly if he can't be moved.

We are going to lose a couple good players this offseason. I don't see how Fredric's agent lets him take under 5 per year. Wouldn't have been a bad thing from a hockey perspective alone if Mitchell Miller was lighting it up in Providence and we had an ELC guy to fill a roster spot for the minimum to replace Cliffy.

I guess it depend where Frederick's stats end up, but right not we are talking about a player with 16 points on the season. In what is by far his best season. Maybe he continues his improved play of late and pushes up towards 20 goals and 40 points. But even there it is a one year breakout getting up to 5 million per year seems a lot . He is an RFA, is he arbitration eligible? I don't think so (I could be wrong). If he is not that kind of means he is left with Boston as his only option. I would be surprised is he gets much above 3 million per year. My guess is 3 yrs 10 mil total or 2/6
 
  • Like
Reactions: HustleB and Gordoff

Over the volcano

Registered User
Mar 10, 2006
35,252
20,768
Watertown
I guess it depend where Frederick's stats end up, but right not we are talking about a player with 16 points on the season. In what is by far his best season. Maybe he continues his improved play of late and pushes up towards 20 goals and 40 points. But even there it is a one year breakout getting up to 5 million per year seems a lot . He is an RFA, is he arbitration eligible? I don't think so (I could be wrong). If he is not that kind of means he is left with Boston as his only option. I would be surprised is he gets much above 3 million per year. My guess is 3 yrs 10 mil total or 2/6
Maybe - but if we're looking at pts, consider at even strength he's got 5 more games than Marchand and 3 more pts. He's 4th on the club in even strength goals tied with Bergeron. With any kind of PP time his numbers would surely jump (not saying boston doesn't have better options, but other teams certainly don't).

He leads the team in pts/60 at even strength
 
  • Like
Reactions: HustleB and Gordoff

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,533
37,621
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
I guess it depend where Frederick's stats end up, but right not we are talking about a player with 16 points on the season. In what is by far his best season. Maybe he continues his improved play of late and pushes up towards 20 goals and 40 points. But even there it is a one year breakout getting up to 5 million per year seems a lot . He is an RFA, is he arbitration eligible? I don't think so (I could be wrong). If he is not that kind of means he is left with Boston as his only option. I would be surprised is he gets much above 3 million per year. My guess is 3 yrs 10 mil total or 2/6
He is arbitration eligible.
 

LouJersey

Registered User
Jun 29, 2002
69,384
45,681
At the Cross
youtu.be
He's a 25 year old 2nd line jack of all trades. Nothinhg spectacular, maybe just a complimentary piece but surely valuable.

They're clearing 11 million upfront between Foglino, Smith, Wagner and Nosek.
They will have an inordinate amount of work to do next summer, but I’m kinda blocking it out and just enjoying this wonderful on ice product.

In my eyes the GM has built a Stanley cup winning caliber team for the 3rd time in five years
 

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,533
37,621
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
They will have an inordinate amount of work to do next summer, but I’m kinda blocking it out and just enjoying this wonderful on ice product.

In my eyes the GM has built a Stanley cup winning caliber team for the 3rd time in five years
Lou, I have a job for you....

Of all the in season trades Sweeney has made as GM, how many were made while the team was on the road versus how many were made while at home?
 

NeelyDan

Owned by Alicat, Ladyfan and caz16
Sponsor
Jun 28, 2010
7,807
16,134
Dundas, Ontario
Freakin team is 32-4 and ‘yah letz trade Grizz cuz he’s short even though he’s tallah den me’

Go Broonz

Oh and les’ trade Carlo cuz he’s not tuff like us guyz’

Go Broonz

I’m so tired of this …joke? I think? I mean it sorta has to because what’s happening is people aren’t concerned about his size, per se (you don’t hear the same comments about a similarly sized Clifton), but his (mostly playoff) hesitation to go into the corners and/or ability to not get bullied in front of the net during a time of the year where physicality gets amped way up.

And it’s a legitimate concern, so I don’t get this super hostile response type
 

mar2kbos

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
7,202
8,391
I’m so tired of this …joke? I think? I mean it sorta has to because what’s happening is people aren’t concerned about his size, per se (you don’t hear the same comments about a similarly sized Clifton), but his (mostly playoff) hesitation to go into the corners and/or ability to not get bullied in front of the net during a time of the year where physicality gets amped way up.

And it’s a legitimate concern, so I don’t get this super hostile response type
I tend to bring out hostility in people 😂
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Gordoff

mar2kbos

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
7,202
8,391
They will have an inordinate amount of work to do next summer, but I’m kinda blocking it out and just enjoying this wonderful on ice product.

In my eyes the GM has built a Stanley cup winning caliber team for the 3rd time in five years
While he deserves credit he also got lucky this past off season. If Bergeron and Krejci got what they could in the open market neither would be here. If they weren’t loyal to the team and willing to take fourth line pay team would be vastly different, not a basement dweller but nothing like they are now.
 

UncleRico

Registered User
May 8, 2017
9,326
12,149
He's a 25 year old 2nd line jack of all trades. Nothinhg spectacular, maybe just a complimentary piece but surely valuable.

They're clearing 11 million upfront between Foglino, Smith, Wagner and Nosek.
And they have $19.9m in cap space without signing pasta next year.



So if the rumors are true about $11m for pasta then that drops down to $8.9m in cap space with still needing to sign

1c, 2c, 3LW, 3RW, 4c, 4RW, 4LW and swayman.

Way too many holes to fill to be giving him a new deal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad