Flyers have three goalies for next year, and although Markstom is an upgrade IMO I don't think they would be after a goalie.
a top 4 D and a #1 goalie at 50% for a first. That is a steal. If that was offered the flyers should take it than flip each player.
Don’t get this logic. Why wouldn’t Calgary just do the same if it’s supposedly great value?
They hundred percent would, Calgary would never do this trade
Of course, but doesn't your comment apply to every trade speculation post ever written, though?
These kind of proposals always make me laugh. OP started with a pick they wanted and then threw some crap at the wall. Andersson is worth that pick alone and Philly doesn't need himIt's one of those special proposals that offers poor value to Calgary, for a pair of players that Philly don't really need.
In other words...it doesn't make any sense. The value would be extremely hard for Philly to turn down, but the fact that Calgary could get more for those two separately is why they'd never offer it in the first place.
For me as a not a fan of a true rebuild, but as a big fan of trade assets for players, it’s a very very good trade.
