scott99
Registered User
- May 13, 2005
- 11,049
- 1,658
Had Ziggy played 7 more seasons their GPG and PPG averages would be a lot closer as no doubt Ziggy's production would have declined. You're right about Ziggy having more seasons with bigger numbers. You're also right about him playing for much worse teams than Kovalev. The question I have for you is, what do you value more; an environment where the team is so poor that most games are essentially meaningless or a winning environment where there is much more pressure to succeed? Scoring more goals individually in games where your team gets blown out vs still scoring plenty (albeit less) but in highly competitive games and contributing to TEAM success as well…
If you put a gun to my head I’d probably pick Ziggy, but it is debatable no doubt.
I agree with you somewhat. But, you talk about pressure ? Ziggy was always his team's best player, always the guy defenses keyed on, therefore, to produce like he did, I would say he faced as much pressure to succeed (individually) than Kovalev. Kovalev always had better teammates to fall back on if HE didn't score. AND, most of the time, he didn't always face oppositions top defensive line of d-men. Ziggy always did. Not taking away from Kovalev, he may even make the Hall Of Fame, but I just think Ziggy was the better player, and I think he proved it.