Estimated_Prophet
Registered User
- Mar 28, 2003
- 11,020
- 12,116
Don't forget, Ghule plays for Montreal, so he automatically sucks to make all the insecure main board posters feel better about their tiny fanbases.Wouldn't even trade Guhle for Zegras and a first
Depending on the 1st, of course you would. Like if it was ths years 3rd OA plus Zegras only an idiot would say no. That said, Anaheim would NEVER offer thatWouldn't even trade Guhle for Zegras and a first
I bet you would. A shame NYR wouldn't reciprocate that consideration for GuhleBut I may consider it if it's for Lafrenière.
Guhle is not a #1DmanSince when does a 50-60pts, unidimensionnal and not physical winger is worth a top pairint Dman, #2 at worse?
Just curious
No one has actually said he’s sucked, he’s just not really a need for Anaheim. And not really at the expense of zegrasDon't forget, Ghule plays for Montreal, so he automatically sucks to make all the insecure main board posters feel better about their tiny fanbases.
Hughes hangs up the phone and Anaheim says yes to this in a millisecond.
Funny how Seider wouldn't be on the top.pair for any of those teams either heh?Just because your team isnt any good at hockey so they have to to play him doesnt make him a top pair D. Jake Walman and Ben Chiarot also play(Ed) a ton for the Wings… are they top pair D?
I’m always waiting for your response to the list of teams I supplied to which of them he would be a top pair D on?
Funny how Seider wouldn't be on the top.pair for any of those teams either heh?
Guhle and Seider are equivalent on our end. They have the same upside.
Would you trade Seider for Zegras?
Guhles probably gonna end up better than anyone at #3 but yeah I guess that works, wouldn't make any sense for the Habs and I wouldn't even be happy about it. Same way Ducks wouldn't be happy to do Newhook+5 for MintyukovDepending on the 1st, of course you would. Like if it was ths years 3rd OA plus Zegras only an idiot would say no. That said, Anaheim would NEVER offer that
3 > 5Guhles probably gonna end up better than anyone at #3 but yeah I guess that works, wouldn't make any sense for the Habs and I wouldn't even be happy about it. Same way Ducks wouldn't be happy to do Newhook+5 for Mintyukov
At least you can count.3 > 5
Zegras >> Newhook
Mintyukov >> Guhle
not even close to a good comp, try again
Do you think before you speak?Keep your primadonna that don't know how to play defense (and when he does, his offensive numbers plummet).
And we'll keep our defensive stud that have all the intangibles that your Z guy can only dream about ..
Maybe the "bad reputation" of Zegras is just a myth, but we're not gonna pay Guhle to make sure if it's true or not.
We did it with Drouin... and it was true, so...
Come on!
The guy seems to have a bad rep, is just coming from a bad season, he's a liability defensively and some are talking Guhle/5th overall for him?
I'm leaving him to you guys, good luck ..
You know in your example, Guhle is Seider, not Walman? He carried the hell out of Matheson at 5v5 while, just like Seider, playing top 5 toughest minutes in the NHL. You know what's nice too? He produced at the exact same rate as Seider at 5v5. (Actually a tad higher but we're talking .271 to .268)Just because your team isnt any good at hockey so they have to to play him doesnt make him a top pair D. Jake Walman and Ben Chiarot also play(Ed) a ton for the Wings… are they top pair D?
I’m always waiting for your response to the list of teams I supplied to which of them he would be a top pair D on?
It's ironic you complain about Montreal trolls yet you're playing the same game...3 > 5
Zegras >> Newhook
Mintyukov >> Guhle
not even close to a good comp, try again
Weird because Montreal keeps calling back lol
Pretty sure the rumor was anaheim asked for reinbacher/guhle +In your delusional fantasy land Montreal keeps calling back offering Guhle for Zegras. Anaheim definitely asked and Hughes definitely said no...otherwise there would be a trade to announce. This is an example of rational thought.....it is fun and you should try it.
Where? I have plenty of good conversations with hab fans that are willing to have good conversations.It's ironic you complain about Montreal trolls yet you're playing the same game...
Pretty sure the rumor was anaheim asked for reinbacher/guhle +
You can't anoint something a rumour just because a mindless message board poster or some beta weiner fabricates it on their ridiculos site.
There is zero evidence of such an ask and it definitely did not happen as an NHL GM (unlike some posters) would know that such a blatantly stupid proposal would likely turn off a potential trade partner.
How many teams he would play top pair on, who knows, and really who cares. The Top 9 / Top Pair, Top whatever discussions are boring and simple discussion points for fans that haven't followed a player. Look at stats, declare player x is not top pair. Boring.Just because your team isnt any good at hockey so they have to to play him doesnt make him a top pair D. Jake Walman and Ben Chiarot also play(Ed) a ton for the Wings… are they top pair D?
I’m always waiting for your response to the list of teams I supplied to which of them he would be a top pair D on?
And just like i predicted, habs fans continue to attack and make up things about zegras.Keep your primadonna that don't know how to play defense (and when he does, his offensive numbers plummet).
And we'll keep our defensive stud that have all the intangibles that your Z guy can only dream about ..
Maybe the "bad reputation" of Zegras is just a myth, but we're not gonna pay Guhle to make sure if it's true or not.
We did it with Drouin... and it was true, so...
Come on!
The guy seems to have a bad rep, is just coming from a bad season, he's a liability defensively and some are talking Guhle/5th overall for him?
I'm leaving him to you guys, good luck ..
Zegras never tickled my pickle