rt
Clean Hits on Substack
***Yotes Fans Only***
Let’s see the results when they’re public and not linked on the main board. I’m betting the total vote count is 50% lower.
I’ll vote Leonard to even it out.Dammit! I wanted Leonard but accidentally chose Dvorsky when I was trying to swipe on my phone lol.
Awesome, thanks! A little embarrassing to mess up your poll right out the gates lol. Glad you could do that.I’ll vote Leonard to even it out.
Same boat. Huge success in the first round while missing out on Bedard.I say we just get them both...problem solved
Take Dvorsky #6 and then trade up with Washington and select Leonard #8...easy peasy
I’m content to trust our scouts as well. Unless they take someone who’s far down or not even on my list at 6.These seems like it’s too close to call.
Follow-Up: Would anyone actually be disappointed if we chose one over the other? Meaning, do any of you have a very strong preference? For me, it’s basically a coin-toss.
I'm pretty much at "trust our scouts until the player busts". Geekie pick looks iffy, but still way to early to call.These seems like it’s too close to call.
Follow-Up: Would anyone actually be disappointed if we chose one over the other? Meaning, do any of you have a very strong preference? For me, it’s basically a coin-toss.
Coin-toss for me tooThese seems like it’s too close to call.
Follow-Up: Would anyone actually be disappointed if we chose one over the other? Meaning, do any of you have a very strong preference? For me, it’s basically a coin-toss.
There is always a chance Geekie busts or Cooley doesn’t play center. I say keep drafting centers. Centers can always move to wing.Close, but Dvorsky would be my pick. Using some of BA's logic, if there is a tie or players are part of the same tier on your list, you may pick based on need. If there is a position I am most comfortable stacking prospects it is center.
I have Dvorsky #6/Leonard #7, so yeah, wouldn't care either wayThese seems like it’s too close to call.
Follow-Up: Would anyone actually be disappointed if we chose one over the other? Meaning, do any of you have a very strong preference? For me, it’s basically a coin-toss.
These seems like it’s too close to call.
Follow-Up: Would anyone actually be disappointed if we chose one over the other? Meaning, do any of you have a very strong preference? For me, it’s basically a coin-toss.
Prefer risers to those that have fallen slightly or not upped their game. Leonard.
Don’t forget to vote!Will be thrilled with either.
This has become something I factor into prospects now too so I give a slight edge to Leonard. I just wonder if there have rely been enough eyes on Dvorsky to know if he has or hasn't upped his game
I just re-watched Dvorsky play Canada in bronze medal game yesterday. Dvorsky was a dominant force and played heavy minutes in a key position. Strong 200 foot C who can play in any situation with enough offence that he could be a 1C down the road. Ryan O’Reilly type player. Love his game.
Already did! Made sure some friends and my parents did tooDon’t forget to vote!
This is my sense as well. Lacks offensive pizzazz, but everything else is there. And that's not say he doesn't score. It's just not super flashy and fun.