I mean its probably fair to look at 5v5 right? Numbers can get skewed by guys who play on the PP and not the PK or vice versa. Personally like 3yrs of data myself as it gives a more accurate picture of now vs a whole career. Based on that and looking at the rel numbers, Wood since 2018
Obviously 0.0 would be neutral (team isn't better or worse with Wood on the ice) when looking at Rel's.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Player CF% Rel SF% Rel GF% Rel xGF% Rel SCF% Rel HDCF% Rel Miles Wood -1.1 0.04 -6.35 -1.7 -3.27 -0.41
Biggest concern's are obviously the GF% Rel and SCF% Rel. Oddly enough his xGF% is significantly lower than his actual GF% Rel. The rest of them are close enough to neutral that it doesn't concern me. I'm sure it doesn't help his numbers that he's a guy that likes to fly the zone (and NJD asks him to do it as well), which can lead to problems obviously and would kill his GF% Rel.
Not sure I can completely agree with you on his linemates being better away from Wood. Again Rel numbers at 5v5 this year, this is his top 3 linemates in TOI
Looks like McLeod is worse, Bastian is better and Zajac for the most part is slightly worse.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
CF% Rel Without Wood FF% Rel Without Wood SF% Rel Without Wood GF% Rel Without Wood xGF% Rel Without Wood SCF% Rel Without Wood HDCF% Rel Without Wood Michael McLeod -7.36 -4.99 -4.47 -6.81 -5.45 -6.82 -14.91 Nathan Bastian 9.29 10.52 10.08 10.51 7.86 5.67 -1.26 Travis Zajac -1.01 -2.14 -4.35 16.01 -1.06 -1.62 0.9
Wood plays an up-tempo game with a high risk high reward style. Our problem isn't stopping teams from scoring, its actually scoring ourselves. I think he'd be a quality 3rd liner next to Coyle on this team.
yeah i know what you mean, i hate knowing things tooI absolutely can't stand when people use all of those fancy stat numbers. Maybe it's because I don't really get it, but I'm 95% sure it's because I don't care.
Krejcis new RW coming in hot
All of the numbers and really statements more than anything I made were based on 5v5 stats and the data you're presenting here backs up everything I've said. 3 years vs whole career is a viable argument but we're talking about tacking on an additional 136 games, not 8 years, and there isn't much statistical change in his early numbers to his more recent numbers.
This is last year:
View attachment 415994
The team was significantly worse when he was on the ice. It's double the sample size of this season and is where I got the info that made me make that statement. Now looking a bit deeper it seems like its a bit more neutral over the longer span of his 300 game career but always pretty bad.
The larger point here is that Miles Wood isn't actually any good.
Krejcis new RW coming in hot
Haha wondering that as well, does he choose who can claim him?So how does this work...I see that he has a Modified-No Trade Clause. Someone can still claim him because he doesnt have a NMC right?
I absolutely can't stand when people use all of those fancy stat numbers. Maybe it's because I don't really get it, but I'm 95% sure it's because I don't care.
Krejcis new RW coming in hot
There were some advanced stats that were thrown around over the summer that convinced some posters that it wouldn’t be a good deal for us to trade DeBrusk for Boeser, when we were talking about trade proposals with Vancouver. Edmonton fans also threw around advanced stats to convince themselves that some of their lesser D were better than Nurse.I absolutely can't stand when people use all of those fancy stat numbers. Maybe it's because I don't really get it, but I'm 95% sure it's because I don't care.
I don't care where player A's defensive stick was last night during dinner, and i definitely don't give a bakers f*** about quality shots during breakfast.
Krejcis new RW coming in hot
Not sure I'd say he isn't any good, but to each their own. As you said its a bit more neutral and we're not looking for him to carry this team or even a line. We just need him to come in and play the up-tempo speed game that he plays.
His team was -10% xG below average last year with him on the ice. That's bad. It's only -1% this year, which is still bad. He does play up tempo and with speed. The result has generally been bad for his team when he does that. He's not someone the bruins should seek to acquire.
I’m sure there’s some advanced stat that shows him as a pig and everything our eye is seeing is untrue.Well the eye test told us Wood is good. He was the best player on the ice last game. He scored and created tons of room for his team. He could of had 3-4 goals easily, although he’s not a goal scorer he can flat out fly.
Oh my are the flyers in trouble with the crazy contracts and faltering team. Perhaps trade for Gritty or Giroux?
But Giroux would be interesting. UFA 2022-2023 byt 8.25.
Blades would like a word with you privately.
okLets move on from pro stats - anti stats shall we?