He even suggested that this was put out as a "feeler" in my earlier post. If this really ends up some people jumping the gun on a rumor, then it's more proof that wrestling twitter/journalism is terrible.SRS is being both sides guy, and he’s WWE’s leaker, so definitely a possibility maybe even probability.
The actual known journalists aren’t running it though. Just the Eklunds.He even suggested that this was put out as a "feeler" in my earlier post. If this really ends up some people jumping the gun on a rumor, then it's more proof that wrestling twitter/journalism is terrible.
Yeah, it's just that there seem to be too many people with no actual information spreading rumors. It's been said/documented that Meltzer no longer has good sources at WWE and he's been well off on several rumors in the last couple of years (the one about Asuka the best/worst example) and he seemed to be in on this one too. So do we put Meltzer in the Eklund category now too?The actual known journalists aren’t running it though. Just the Eklunds.
Yeah, it's just that there seem to be too many people with no actual information spreading rumors. It's been said/documented that Meltzer no longer has good sources at WWE and he's been well off on several rumors in the last couple of years (the one about Asuka the best/worst example) and he seemed to be in on this one too. So do we put Meltzer in the Eklund category now too?
He did report that Vince has had talks with Saudi Arabia for a while though, hasn't he?Meltzer did not report that WWE had a deal with Saudi Arabia.
Meltzer did not report that? lolYeah, it's just that there seem to be too many people with no actual information spreading rumors. It's been said/documented that Meltzer no longer has good sources at WWE and he's been well off on several rumors in the last couple of years (the one about Asuka the best/worst example) and he seemed to be in on this one too. So do we put Meltzer in the Eklund category now too?
He did do that....which could still be true. I would honestly be surprised if it wasn't.He did report that Vince has had talks with Saudi Arabia for a while though, hasn't he?
Not even close to the same thing. You've been clutching at that one for far too long, as well.Yeah, it's just that there seem to be too many people with no actual information spreading rumors. It's been said/documented that Meltzer no longer has good sources at WWE and he's been well off on several rumors in the last couple of years (the one about Asuka the best/worst example) and he seemed to be in on this one too. So do we put Meltzer in the Eklund category now too?
The actual known journalists aren’t running it though. Just the Eklunds.
Didn't he say there might be "monster news" coming yesterday?He did report that Vince has had talks with Saudi Arabia for a while though, hasn't he?
Report what?Meltzer did not report that? lol
Tony Khan feeling like a king rn
Still a LA show and the check will still be large.
I don't think a lot of talent is going to really care as much as people want them too as long as the checks are still being cashed.
Vince being put back in charge of creative will cause talent to stir more then new ownership
No.Didn't he say there might be "monster news" coming yesterday?
Report what?
He did report that Vince has had talks with Saudi Arabia for a while though, hasn't he?
That's true.I'd be shocked if this isn't true.
Saudi's like dealing with Vince. If there's a rumor of sale going through, makes sense they're talking, regardless of if it leads somewhere or not
Well it was Alvarez but Meltzer also hinted at something:
Well it was Alvarez but Meltzer also hinted at something:
All-Purpose News Thread Part II
Hahahaha, yeah right. Oh it's true, I've literally said it even to you just last year.forums.hfboards.com