DitchMarner
TheGlitchintheSwitch
Which accomplished wrestlers are the worst at actual wrestling?
I'd go with:
5. The Rock: He was electrifying and could be funny as hell, but he was always much better at talking than wrestling.
4. Kevin Nash: Limited and generic big man.
3. Bill Goldberg: He could work a solid enough match under the right circumstances, but too often it was just gorilla press slam, spear and jackhammer. I was never a fan.
2. Hulk Hogan: Whenever I want to see a technical masterpiece, Hulk Hogan is pretty much the last big name wrestler I want to watch.
1. The Ultimate Warrior: LOAD DA SPACESHIP WITH DA ROCKET FUEL AND FEEL THE POWER OF THE WARRRRRRIIIIOOOORRRRRR AAAARRRRGGHHHHHH!!!!!!! Not my cup of tea.
Honorable mentions:
John Cena (circa 2004 to 2010 or so)
Steve Austin (post neck injury to late 1999/2000 hiatus): Similar to The Rock in this era, but I give him a slight edge.
Scott Steiner: His skills and abilities took a noticeable dip around the time his promos and character markedly improved. He was all right in WCW toward the end of the company's run but sucked ass in early 2003 in the WWE.
Not quite there:
HHH: I wouldn't put him in the same class as guys like Flair or Jericho when it comes to wrestling, but to me he was a clear notch above the Hogans and Warriors in his prime.
The Undertaker (in his first decade): I think he deserves somewhat of a pass because of his character and the wrestlers he had to work with. Could Hart or Michaels have gotten good matches out of Giant Gonzales or King Mabel?
Sheamus: Not particularly bad or anything but generic and pretty bland.
I'd go with:
5. The Rock: He was electrifying and could be funny as hell, but he was always much better at talking than wrestling.
4. Kevin Nash: Limited and generic big man.
3. Bill Goldberg: He could work a solid enough match under the right circumstances, but too often it was just gorilla press slam, spear and jackhammer. I was never a fan.
2. Hulk Hogan: Whenever I want to see a technical masterpiece, Hulk Hogan is pretty much the last big name wrestler I want to watch.
1. The Ultimate Warrior: LOAD DA SPACESHIP WITH DA ROCKET FUEL AND FEEL THE POWER OF THE WARRRRRRIIIIOOOORRRRRR AAAARRRRGGHHHHHH!!!!!!! Not my cup of tea.
Honorable mentions:
John Cena (circa 2004 to 2010 or so)
Steve Austin (post neck injury to late 1999/2000 hiatus): Similar to The Rock in this era, but I give him a slight edge.
Scott Steiner: His skills and abilities took a noticeable dip around the time his promos and character markedly improved. He was all right in WCW toward the end of the company's run but sucked ass in early 2003 in the WWE.
Not quite there:
HHH: I wouldn't put him in the same class as guys like Flair or Jericho when it comes to wrestling, but to me he was a clear notch above the Hogans and Warriors in his prime.
The Undertaker (in his first decade): I think he deserves somewhat of a pass because of his character and the wrestlers he had to work with. Could Hart or Michaels have gotten good matches out of Giant Gonzales or King Mabel?
Sheamus: Not particularly bad or anything but generic and pretty bland.