It seems a lot of tickets were bought by brokers either thinking the tournament would be profitable, or maybe banking on a USA-Canada final. As it is a lot of tickets on the secondary market seem to be going unsold. Basically any game not involving Canada or North America is selling for about $6. Even the North America tickets are selling for like $30 on $130 tickets.
For those who attended, how did the upper bowl look in terms of attendance?
can someone post the TV viewership in Canada for those first games??? or maybe it isn't up anywhere
I got $239 tickets for $43 for Sweden-Russia. The guys sitting next to us got theirs for $35.
That picture that was posted earlier in the thread was the only section that had a significant amount of empty seats. And it wasn't as bad as the picture makes it out to be. But it was in a pretty noticeable area of the arena.
Learn some history and some geography. When the west indies cricket teams were originally created in the late 1920s for cricket the included entities nons had achieved independence (or would for the next 30 or so years). As of yet still over a third of the west indies states are not independent (Sint Maarten, US Virgin Islands, some British colonies). When the Cricket world cup was first formulated in 1975 even Trinidad and Tobago, on of the larger west indies sovereigns, was not a republic. The history of these teams is rooted deep in colonialism and have been competing under the colonial flag for nearly a century. Even the term "west indies" as you can imagine was not self-attributed. They also constitute a very small collective of the international market and contribute comparably little to international economics (compared to say Europe). The European team is nominally European but excludes prominent European states while including players from states not part of the EU, and is a slap in the face to the number one geopolitical or economic entity in terms GDP globally. Comparing the two is a blatant gesture of ignorance.no.
"administrative entity" and "true continental" are meaningless made-up terms.
Political statement? Please, they were created for the same reason you'd never have a "Team Washington DC" and a "Team Hawaii" and a "Team Georgia" in a World Cup those aren't countries and neither were any of the west indies countries at the time of the start of international cricket, still many by the advent of the cricket world cup and still over a third today.please, the EU is also an "administrative entity".
the windies weren't a political statement, they were an attempt to put together a competitive team.
Political statement? Please, they were created for the same reason you'd never have a "Team Washington DC" and a "Team Hawaii" and a "Team Georgia" in a World Cup those aren't countries and neither were any of the west indies countries at the time of the start of international cricket, still many by the advent of the cricket world cup and still over a third today.
Some Britain, some the US, some Netherlands, historically some were under French, Spanish, British, Dutch rule etc and in a more xenophobic era indigenous West Indians were A. not necessarily given citizenship instead often requiring naturalization and B. perhaps less likely to be accepted by the European following at home.So they were just part of britain then. Why did they create a fake gimmick team just for the colonies?
We are hockey nation, but World Cup is something strange for us. Even hard hockey fans don't know that something like World Cup exists.
First game against Canada at 2 A.M watched 100k viewers (share only 40%).
please, the EU is also an "administrative entity".
the windies weren't a political statement, they were an attempt to put together a competitive team.
Please, you should know that the Britons have a peculiar and fluctuating notion of what constitutes a nation within their sphere of influence, which is often reflected in the national teams of traditionally British sports.So they were just part of britain then. Why did they create a fake gimmick team just for the colonies?
That feeling when Toronto sold out every game of the world juniors like a year and a half ago.
...That's actually not THAT bad for a 2AM game, no?
(looks at Wiki because I don't know exactly Czech Republic's population)
Okay it's about what I expected, maybe 1M more.
Tickets are $5 CDN a piece on ticketmaster and $6 US on stubhub.
Thousands for sale. No one wants to go to a game for $6 in Toronto I guess.
Yet, fans will pay $80 for a weekday snoozer with the maple leafs during regular season
Toronto 'sold out' every game of the WJHC just like they 'sold out' every game of this tournament. Everyone bought packages to see Canada and are now getting crushed on the re-sale of the other games.
I bought tickets on various sites to US/Europe, NA/Finland, Finland/Sweden and Czech/USA. Combined 'face' on the tickets for the four games is $570. I paid $82 (CAD, post fees). And could have probably paid $20-30 less if I waited it out a bit more.
From the GDT:
Tell me again how this is a great financial success.
Toronto is NOT a hockey market. They have a popular NHL team, but they do not show up for non Maple Leaf events unless Team Canada is playing. They barely even support junior teams.
Toronto is NOT a hockey market. They have a popular NHL team, but they do not show up for non Maple Leaf events unless Team Canada is playing. They barely even support junior teams.