Is it not a legitimate question?Please give an impetus for this (other than "the sexual assault thread seems to have settled down and the mods must need something to do") and perhaps some discussion starters.
I'm not saying that you're looking to stir things up specifically. What I'm saying is that this topic USUALLY stirs things up.
Is it not a legitimate question?
what is your question?That really depends on your answers to my questions.
Which would you rather fight, ten 5-year olds or five 10-year olds?Which is scarier: a horse-sized duck or a duck-shaped horse?
Which is shaped like a duck?Which would you rather fight, ten 5-year olds or five 10-year olds?
It's above your post. What's the impetus for this?what is your question?
Not surprised the person starting the thread had this opinion hahaId favor the minor midget team personally.
I think a good Bantam team would likely give a PWHL team a run for their lack of money.
well boys rule and girls drool so the answer is pretty obvious...
good thing you aren't one thenIf I was a woman I would find that a bit offensive tbh, was it really necessary?
Why didn't you ask about Uranus?Which one is from Jupiter and which one is more stupider?
ummm interesting…i mThe womens team usually played in Alberta U18AAA for the first quarter of the season to prep for the Olympics and would end up around the middle of the standings leading up to that point. No idea how'd they do in Prep leagues like CSSHL or in Massachussets, or GTHL AAA but most likely theyd be a .500 or below team. The best teams in the top half of the circuit would beat them.
It is a fairly strange thread for you to come in here and make tho. What exactly is the merit of you "proving" that 'boys > girls' like the thousands of misogynistic athletic comparisons between the two sexes already out there? Everyone here understands basic biology dude.
I don’t think its a crazy opinion though. Im sure they are much closer to an elite major bantam team then they would be to a CHL team.Not surprised the person starting the thread had this opinion haha
Personally I also think the CHL team would win because of physical dominance, but it's a stupid question, what do you try to prove with that?
Forget about ducks.Which is shaped like a duck?
This kind of goes both ways. Lots of people come in and say how a female could play in the NHL/AHL even Major junior.Fellas, women's hockey should stand on its own merits. This constant comparison to men's hockey is ridiculous.
Also, the answer is duck-shaped horse.
I read it as a sarcastic joke. A mockery of the thread topic, not women. A satire comment.If I was a woman I would find that a bit offensive tbh, was it really necessary?