It's only wonen's hockey that us & canada are far ahead. This years WJC is irrelevant because so many players didn't participate. And even then the US didn't make the final. In December there could be 5+ good teams if the NHL releases some of the top layers like Slafkovsky. Canada, USA, Sweden, Finland, Slovakia. In any event the point of watching the WJC is to see how the top prospects stack up.I can’t get into these tournaments. Even the mens WJC I can’t get into anymore. There’s a handful of competitive teams and everyone else is a dumpster fire. Makes getting excited for these very difficult imo. Just have the us/can play best of 7 and let everyone else stay home.
I was referring to us/can playing best of 7 in this tourney only.It's only wonen's hockey that us & canada are far ahead. This years WJC is irrelevant because so many players didn't participate. And even then the US didn't make the final. In December there could be 5+ good teams if the NHL releases some of the top layers like Slafkovsky. Canada, USA, Sweden, Finland, Slovakia. In any event the point of watching the WJC is to see how the top prospects stack up.
Canada vs US is usually pretty intense.I have to be honest, I don't think it's very good hockey. Sorry.
Yes it is. I just don't think the quality of hockey is that high. Maybe it's just me.Canada vs US is usually pretty intense.
Of course, the talent is unequal to NHL, but these broads would kick our sorry asses.Yes it is. I just don't think the quality of hockey is that high. Maybe it's just me.
I remember a few years ago, my son was playing for the worst midget B team in his league, at mid seaon, they were 0-10, being beaten with an average score of 7-1.Of course, the talent is unequal to NHL, but these broads would kick our sorry asses.
It’s not, it’s painful to watch imo.I have to be honest, I don't think it's very good hockey. Sorry.
The Canadiens were underwhelming for a lot of the past season. Parity and too many teams for the amount of available talent makes a lot of hockey watching underwhelming unless you are a team supporter. How do people show up to watch the Laval Rocket in the playoffs of the AHL Calder Cup? It’s not that you’re watching high level hockey. You’re rooting for the team, you have a couple of players you like, the games are competitive and there’s something on the line.I remember a few years ago, my son was playing for the worst midget B team in his league, at mid seaon, they were 0-10, being beaten with an average score of 7-1.
A father of one of the boys also had a daughter playing for team Quebec that were prepping to go to the Canadian championship ( which if I remember well , went on to win)
Long story short, he managed to organize a game between the worst team in the league and the absolute best girls in Quebec in the same age group , and the boys demolished them . The scorekeeper stopped putting up points at 11-0 during the first period, and the boys were bending backwards not to hurt the girls.
I’m all for the girls playing hockey, but find it very underwhelming.
Tread lightly in this one.
Bill Burr has an answer. Spoiler, many male feminists may not like it.I find it unfair that women hockey players make less than Sydney Crosby.
equal play equal pay
jokes
And who'll go watch the games? Will you? In the past and present, there have been hockey leagues for women. The problem isn't that leagues didn't exist. The problem is no one goes to watch them.Women’s hockey doesn’t need to be at the NHL level, just to be at the highest level it can be for women’s athletes.
Hard to do that without a league of their own though. It has to get the opportunity to grow.
And who'll go watch the games? Will you? In the past and present, there have been hockey leagues for women. The problem isn't that leagues didn't exist. The problem is no one goes to watch them.
For the same reasons women play only three sets in tennis majors, I think we need to see reduced periods. The 1st period pace is usually excellent when Canada plays the US. After that it's a slog.