GDT: Winnipeg Jets @ Nashville p***ycats today at 6pm

LowLefty

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 29, 2016
7,755
14,167
Crosby never touched or played the puck, imo that's interference
KC is protecting the puck and himself - that is not interference.
KC had the angle and was standing over the puck - he has a right to protect the puck and using your body to do that is legal.

Edit - my point is more about if this is really "pure and simple" - if it was, it would be called
 

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
8,413
20,525
I believe it's technically interference, although it might fall under the puck battle/body position exemption. They almost never call it...but it's a type of pick.

A “pick” is the action of a player who checks an opponent who is not in possession of the puck and is unaware of the impending check/hit. A player who is aware of an impending hit, not deemed to be a legal “battle for the puck,” may not be interfered with by a player or goalkeeper delivering a “pick.” A player delivering a “pick” is one who moves into an opponent’s path without initially having body position, SECTION 7 – RESTRAINING INFRACTIONSNATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE OFFICIAL RULES 2024-202588thereby taking him out of the play. When this is done, an interference penalty shall be assessed.​
Connor had body position, and didn't move into Crosby's path

Reverse hits are interference pure and simple.
So Connor should have gotten out of the way and given Crosby the puck? Why does Crosby get to initiate contact on Connor in that situation, but not vice versa?

And where is the line between "bracing for a hit" and "reverse hit"?

Contact is contact. Sometimes you're the hammer, sometimes you're the nail. Don't be a sissy if you end up the nail when you thought you were being the hammer
 

bustamente

Fraud Supporter
Jun 29, 2015
44,674
87,131
Fraud City MB
KC is protecting the puck and himself - that is not interference.
KC had the angle and was standing over the puck - he has a right to protect the puck and using your body to do that is legal.
Protect the puck yes throw a hit like that no way should that be legal. We are going to disagree on this one and any reverse hit I'm guessing
 

bustamente

Fraud Supporter
Jun 29, 2015
44,674
87,131
Fraud City MB
Connor had body position, and didn't move into Crosby's path


So Connor should have gotten out of the way and given Crosby the puck? Why does Crosby get to initiate contact on Connor in that situation, but not vice versa?

And where is the line between "bracing for a hit" and "reverse hit"?

Contact is contact. Sometimes you're the hammer, sometimes you're the nail. Don't be a sissy if you end up the nail when you thought you were being the hammer
1:28 mark of the video Crosby does not initiate contact.

 

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
8,413
20,525
1:28 mark of the video Crosby does not initiate contact.


Jesus, all Connor did was use his body to box him out

Edit: Crosby definitely initiates contact at the same time connor does. I slowed it down further - ypu can tell by his left arm


 

The Blue Baron

Registered User
Nov 13, 2015
16,188
26,238
Hoser Country
I wondered that as well.:laugh:

1732401262261.gif


1732401348301.gif

Of a bygone era!
 

LowLefty

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 29, 2016
7,755
14,167
Protect the puck yes throw a hit like that no way should that be legal. We are going to disagree on this one and any reverse hit I'm guessing
Not to drag this out but is that really throwing a hit - he's basically backing into the guy which happens all the time when working the boards -
It's the others guy's momentum that is playing just as much a part -
Anyway, I get where you are coming from - this can be looked at from a few different perspectives
 
  • Like
Reactions: bustamente

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad