- Dec 29, 2016
- 7,755
- 14,167
The one last night wasn't -Reverse hits are interference pure and simple.
The one last night wasn't -Reverse hits are interference pure and simple.
Crosby never touched or played the puck, imo that's interferenceThe one last night wasn't -
KC is protecting the puck and himself - that is not interference.Crosby never touched or played the puck, imo that's interference
Connor had body position, and didn't move into Crosby's pathI believe it's technically interference, although it might fall under the puck battle/body position exemption. They almost never call it...but it's a type of pick.
A “pick” is the action of a player who checks an opponent who is not in possession of the puck and is unaware of the impending check/hit. A player who is aware of an impending hit, not deemed to be a legal “battle for the puck,” may not be interfered with by a player or goalkeeper delivering a “pick.” A player delivering a “pick” is one who moves into an opponent’s path without initially having body position, SECTION 7 – RESTRAINING INFRACTIONSNATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE OFFICIAL RULES 2024-202588thereby taking him out of the play. When this is done, an interference penalty shall be assessed.
So Connor should have gotten out of the way and given Crosby the puck? Why does Crosby get to initiate contact on Connor in that situation, but not vice versa?Reverse hits are interference pure and simple.
Protect the puck yes throw a hit like that no way should that be legal. We are going to disagree on this one and any reverse hit I'm guessingKC is protecting the puck and himself - that is not interference.
KC had the angle and was standing over the puck - he has a right to protect the puck and using your body to do that is legal.
1:28 mark of the video Crosby does not initiate contact.Connor had body position, and didn't move into Crosby's path
So Connor should have gotten out of the way and given Crosby the puck? Why does Crosby get to initiate contact on Connor in that situation, but not vice versa?
And where is the line between "bracing for a hit" and "reverse hit"?
Contact is contact. Sometimes you're the hammer, sometimes you're the nail. Don't be a sissy if you end up the nail when you thought you were being the hammer
1:28 mark of the video Crosby does not initiate contact.
I wondered that as well.Why is the word p***ycats censored lol
1:28 mark of the video Crosby does not initiate contact.
Not to drag this out but is that really throwing a hit - he's basically backing into the guy which happens all the time when working the boards -Protect the puck yes throw a hit like that no way should that be legal. We are going to disagree on this one and any reverse hit I'm guessing
Why is the word p***ycats censored lol