great article. do we miss bruce macleod or what?
instead we're stuck with the useless writers and a man-child blogger.
I don't know I enjoy khan well enough.
I've always wondered what Mickey Redmond really thinks. At points last season it seemed like he was really straining not to just unleash. You could hear the veiled criticism trying to expose itself but him professionally holding it back. I think he sees a team he loves falling behind and doesn't like it.
Or maybe I'm making stuff up in my mind.
Every part of that article sounds very plausible.
The only surprising part was in relation to how Holland and Babcock treat the media. If they are so open and willing to talk to the media, why is it that they seem MIA since Quincey was signed? Is it because HSJ and her crew of flunkies don't want to make Holland look bad? It sounds like a cult and the beat writers are just feeding Holland+Babcock's ego.
Even if those writers do question the awful moves made over the past five years, they just look back at the past Stanley Cup's and give them a free pass. Unfortunately it doesn't look like the Red Wings are ever going to run out of free passes, and the writers will continue to tow the company line, or try to write as little as possible when a bad move is made.
I do not get my news or opinions on the Red Wings from FREEP or Mlive. HFBoards is where i go when i want to get real news/opinions on the Wings.
It's kind of subtle, but it's interesting to see the differences between AK's reporting and HSJ's. They often disagree, although AK is usually pretty quiet about it. That's one thing about AK: he knows when to keep his mouth shut. Somebody asked him his opinion of Cleary's signing and he gave them the organization's opinion instead. Smart guy.Might as well be a robot.
Might as well be a robot.
Every part of that article sounds very plausible.
The only surprising part was in relation to how Holland and Babcock treat the media. If they are so open and willing to talk to the media, why is it that they seem MIA since Quincey was signed? Is it because HSJ and her crew of flunkies don't want to make Holland look bad? It sounds like a cult and the beat writers are just feeding Holland+Babcock's ego.
Even if those writers do question the awful moves made over the past five years, they just look back at the past Stanley Cup's and give them a free pass. Unfortunately it doesn't look like the Red Wings are ever going to run out of free passes, and the writers will continue to tow the company line, or try to write as little as possible when a bad move is made.
I do not get my news or opinions on the Red Wings from FREEP or Mlive. HFBoards is where i go when i want to get real news/opinions on the Wings.
Somebody asked him his opinion of Cleary's signing and he gave them the organization's opinion instead. Smart guy.
Probably because they've got 2 months off between long seasons so they're on vacation right now.
I think a lot of it is that he doesn't want to insult the guy in the press. If you don't have anything nice to say, etc. Plus, I bet he's confident that Cleary will make it obvious on the ice.Those kind of things infuriate me, personally.
Why have a Q & A segment when you can't even give your own opinions?
I guess it's mostly personal preference. That type of journalism is unappealing to me.
Holland has been on vacation for five years. It won't kill him if he goes back to work for a couple days in July.
If you're talking about the article, I agree. It's interesting, but it doesn't conclude much of anything of relevance except that some people disagree with how the Detroit media works.I was not really impressed. It all appeared to be finger pointing everywhere. We didn't really solve the question that we asked to begin with, which is kind of poor.