Gretzky as the Coyotes' Coach 2005-2009

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
While these anecdotes point towards a woeful lack of teaching skills, I think the concept that Gretzky couldn't comprehend his players' limitations is somewhat overblown. I'm sure he could figure out that he wasn't coaching a roster full of 200-point players :laugh:

But I have said before that the NHL coaching doesn't seem to be very professional. To become a coach in European football, even superstars need to obtain a license, and a Pro license requires coaching experience in minor leagues. Even Zidane worked for Real Madrid for several years as the team's sporting director before becoming an assistant to a great manager Ancelotti, then coaching their minor team and eventually becoming the big team coach. Gretzky just stepped into the head coach role right away with no training (and, I suspect, having experienced little coaching as a player).


I think there's more to it. Tampa's players doesn't seem to be bothered that Cooper wasn't even a pro player.
Maybe the reason for star players rarely becoming great coaches isn't the matter of them not being able to do so, but rather not having a need or desire to be a great coach. Stars are wealthy, successful and have a great reputation. Why would they keep making sacrifices for a new career that is stressful and very likely to tarnish their image?
Makes sense. I’m just telling you what I heard from a close source.
 
It's kinda funny in retrospect, but Larry Robinson didn't love being a head coach. He was much happier being an assistant coach and just teaching players. Head coach has to be more of a disciplinarian and motivator which Larry admitted wasn't his strong suit. Larry had a rough go of it in his first head coaching gig with LA. The Devils got a bit lazy in 2001-02 which led to Larry being let go and then awkwardly he agreed to almost immediately come back as an assistant. Larry had a brief second stint as Devils head coach followed by another stint as an assistant.
When he came back as an assistant in 2001-02 that was super weird. But you’re right, maybe that was just a better role for Big Bird.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
Coaches can’t really make a roster better than what it is other than employing a system. They weren’t a very good team in my memory. I never felt like it had anything to do with Gretzky.

A good coach can take a roster and at least make the sum greater than its parts. Look what happened when Dave Tippett came.

Gretzky did the opposite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BHD and mouser
Coaches can’t really make a roster better than what it is other than employing a system. They weren’t a very good team in my memory. I never felt like it had anything to do with Gretzky.

Gretzky was a lot more than just a head coach. He was hired as Managing Partner of the Coyotes and also in charge of Hockey Operations. Further, Gretzky hired his former agent Mike Barnett to be the team GM with no prior experience in a role like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
Patrick Roy, Rod Brindamour & MSL aren't too bad albeit no cups as coaches so far.
brind'amour and St. louis are both great examples of guys who experienced every role. Who had to fight their way to the top. Star players, for sure, but the gritty kind, who flew under radars for a long time.

Roy pulls his goalie in the wrong end, shorthanded, lol.

Larry Robinson was a great coach and player, as has been brought up, and the closest to 'superstar' status of the ones mentioned. I would still argue that he is of the grit, toughness, determination side of the superstar coin, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
most great coaches were fringe NHLrs, or didnt even quite make it.

Id say that those guys would likely largely be star centers as kids, 2nd liners as juniors, and role players in the league they got to. They would have run the gamut, able to relate to any player.

Superstars only ever do superstar things. And they cant relate to what normal people struggle with.

This is the real answer. The ones who had the skills to transcend the game are never going to know as much, in terms of deep knowledge and attention to detail, as the guys who were just barely hanging on and fighting for their career with every shift.

You see it in every sport. The superstars do not turn in to superstar coaches. It’s the washouts or the pluggers who end up in the HOF for their coaching abilities. The ones who were FORCED to learn every nook and cranny of advantage in order to survive. To see it from above as a game of chess instead of enforcing their physical will on others, exploiting their natural talent or advantage.

Arguably there is also the charisma element, which is also unrelated to being a superstar talent, but I think that’s tremendously horrendously overrated. You need the respect of your locker room, but that ultimately does NOT come from rah-rah speeches like a lot of people think. Speeches get old REAL fast no matter how good when you’re losing. Respect comes from winning and winning alone. And for that, you need someone who was forced by necessity of circumstances to study every angle of the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dingo
Toe Blake was a HHOFer as a player.

Then arguably had a stronger run as a coach.
Not just strong, Toe Blake is a very reasonable candidate for the GOAT coach, along with Arbour and Shero.

This idea that great players cant coach in hockey doesnt hold water for me, pre-expansion coaching is actually littered with significant playing stars like Blake, Hap Day, Jack Adams, Joe Primeau, Dick Irvin, Frank Boucher, and Art Ross becoming some the most successful coaches of the era. Its almost weirder to find a major coach 1930-1960 that wasnt a star player before becoming a coach.

Milt Schmidt was a superstar as a player with the Bruins and as a coach is commonly credited with creating the Espo line and defining the new style of the Big Bad Bruins. Sinden coached the 70s cup champions, but most of the groundwork came from Schmidt.

Even King Clancy was wildly successful in his brief period behind the bench for the 1967 leafs while Imlach was in the hospital after his january heart attack. Imlach simply rolled with his lines combinations for the rest of the year into the playoffs.

IMO the 'cant teach greatness' excuse is a lazy argument, the real reason why superstars coaching now is so rare is because the money and the lifestyle is too little and too harsh for a multimillionaire to bother with in the modern era.
While these anecdotes point towards a woeful lack of teaching skills, I think the concept that Gretzky couldn't comprehend his players' limitations is somewhat overblown. I'm sure he could figure out that he wasn't coaching a roster full of 200-point players :laugh:
The one detail everybody seems to gloss over with the "why didnt you hit the trailer?" story, is that it wasnt like Gretzky was pulling aside Laracque or Sean O'Donnell to have that conversation, it was Olli Jokinen, a totally reasonable player to grill over making a hockey sense related mistake and not taking the game to a higher level. They might not be capable of making plays on that level, but Olli should have been.

Id feel very confident saying that wasnt the only time a coach had a conversation like that with Jokinen.
 
brind'amour and St. louis are both great examples of guys who experienced every role. Who had to fight their way to the top. Star players, for sure, but the gritty kind, who flew under radars for a long time.

Roy pulls his goalie in the wrong end, shorthanded, lol.

Larry Robinson was a great coach and player, as has been brought up, and the closest to 'superstar' status of the ones mentioned. I would still argue that he is of the grit, toughness, determination side of the superstar coin, though.

In what way? RBA was a first round draft pick and then had a big role his rookie year in St Louis at age 19.
 
Larry Robinson was a great coach and player, as has been brought up, and the closest to 'superstar' status of the ones mentioned.
Patrick Roy reached superstar status or really close to.

1994 season highest paid​

Eric Lindros (Philadelphia Flyers) US$3.35 million (equivalent to $7.1 million in 2024)
Steve Yzerman (Detroit Red Wings) $3.2 million ($6.8 million in 2024)
(tie) Mario Lemieux (Pittsburgh Penguins) $3 million ($6.4 million in 2024)
(tie) Wayne Gretzky (Los Angeles Kings) $3 million ($6.4 million in 2024)
Patrick Roy (Montreal Canadiens) $2.659 million ($5.6 million in 2024)

Goaltender Patrick Roy, who led the Montreal Canadiens to the Stanley Cup last June, signed a four-year contract worth $16 million Monday to become one of the NHL’s highest-paid players.

When he signed (Gretzky was about to sign a new one) he was the third highest paid NHLer:
The contract makes Roy the third-highest paid player in the league behind Mario Lemieux of the Pittsburgh Penguins and Eric Lindros of the Philadelphia Flyers.
 

Ad

Ad