Koized
Registered User
- Oct 8, 2005
- 4,562
- 540
Thanks.
Hell.
The one I would be worried about on that list is Button. With that said, I would be pretty surprised if it isn't Shero.
I think it's pretty clear that Dick Patrick is the one actually doing the leg work on these decisions.
@SkyKerstein: I'm hearing the same names @ChuckGormleyCSN wrote about today...Shero, Fenton, Button & the promoting of MacLellan (don't rule out) #Caps
Operation Shero Beautification.
@pensreport: Been told by person w/ the Pens & still close to him, it's expected Ray Shero will be offered the Capitals GM job. Bizarre for us in Pgh.
@pensreport: Also, the hold-up on the Trotz deal is apparently him making sure they've lined up Shero for GM. He wants that particular GM/HC combo.
Throughout the offseason and into training camp, Predators Coach Barry Trotz has said he wants his team to get better at transitioning the puck, to focus on carrying the puck into the attack (rather than dumping it into the corner and chasing it down). During free agency, General Manager David Poile lauded the amount of shots (read our explanation of Corsi and its relationship to possession and success) his free-agent acquisitions produced and, in some cases, how well those new players carried the puck. It's an easy leap to make between [Eric] Tulsky's research, his relationship with the team and this new emphasis from the Predators decision-makers.
the article and Trotz’s new-found interest in analytics immediately pre-date the 2013-14 season. Barry Trotz, it seems, has chosen "adapt" over "die."
I think it's pretty clear that Dick Patrick is the one actually doing the leg work on these decisions.
I thought we wanted Patrick fired
Yeah 32 years on the job with no Cup and a string of baffling personnel decisions, I guess we're just being impatient. We can spend tomorrow editing our apology letters to DP for jumping the gun. Then we'll email Trotz and the new GM about a parade route on Tuesday.
Makes complete sense to ignore 32 years of failure in favor of the assumed succes of an unannounced hire. No conflict there. Nope.
That reads like:
I love factswhen they are indeed facts, not someone's opinion.except when I disagree with them.
I am not interested in arguing with you about this. I will only say that epistemology does not need to be confusing. I wish you all the best.
If our GM demands full control of the team, who gives a rats ass about Patrick. He isn't going anywhere until he starts grooming a replacement e.g 99.
More than who our GM is, may be him demanding full control of the team. If you get your guy but he is just a pawn, BFD. It seems to be the trend in management, multiple layers and fans really having no idea who is calling the big shots.
Trotz is sounding like the polar opposite of Oates. Which is nice.
The chain of command does seem to change with the wind.
so, we do want Patrick fired. thought so. I was not a big fan of shero and if Patrick hires him, then I should be critical. but I have been told I cant be. so I guess I will live with it.
meanwhile....we are learning things. Patrick is going to hire trotz who is a former cap coach. so it might be that it was not McPhee but Patrick that liked those legacy picks. and now that we know trotz is in a position to tell Patrick who he wants as gm....then.
but yea. I am not allowed to complain. go Patrick, go Trotz, go Team!! I am trying to get with the program here.
I suspect its common for a GM to be stripped of duties but otherwise retained, to avoid all the publicity and uncertainty involved with change.
The GMs make the same salary and keep the same title. The bosses think they know it all, and definitely know they still need a GM so they are not the lightning rod. So they limit powers and do what the mouthpiece couldn't.
And then when THAT fails (think the Oates hire), the GM finally gets the ax.
My theory, every GM should have been fired before they were, and that a team never won a cup with the owner making GM decisions.