SannywithoutCompy
Registered User
- Dec 22, 2020
- 1,612
- 3,024
There's no chance we pass on him. There's been reports that we're high on him since last draft.I think Demidov falls to us and we pass on him lol prepare yourself.
There's no chance we pass on him. There's been reports that we're high on him since last draft.I think Demidov falls to us and we pass on him lol prepare yourself.
Yeah, I don’t seem taking Demidov. They need some size in that lineup. A big D makes sense. We’ll see I guess.Hawk's forwards:
Bedard 5'10
Reichel 6'0
Nazar 5'10
Moore 5'11
Demidov 5'11?
I understand the Demidov appeal, but if you have a chance to get a #1 D instead of having one of the smallest top 6 in the NHL.. you think D would be a logical choice. Which they are weak on.
They will not be available at 5. That's why their names doesn't show in the pool. Linstrom is my choice of the 2. Linsdrom is 2nd OA in my choice. I want players who fits for PO. Fancy scorers undersize, no thanks for me. I saw enough of Leafs lose in first round, if there is a lesson to learn.Demidov or Lindstrom
Everything I’ve heard is we want a forward with size. Combine Denison’s size with the Russian factor and I just can’t see us taking him after passing on Michkov last year.There's no chance we pass on him. There's been reports that we're high on him since last draft.
Ya I think Chicago takes the top D on their board.Yeah, I don’t seem taking Demidov. They need some size in that lineup. A big D makes sense. We’ll see I guess.
And it was a massive failure. Teams need to make the right decisions for their club.The Penguins already had Letang and they went out and got Erik Karlsson. You can have more than one PP QB.
Is Mailloux even a pp qb, or is he more of a shooter, in particular his snapper from the top of the circle/half wall?
In hindsight, we shoulda drafted Michkov last year (he's probably better than Demidov, as good as Demidov is) and we would have our pick at a solid D / RHD at #5.
Somewhat disappointed. I think he's a solid enough player, but there are others I would take ahead of him.Hypothetical scenario, the Habs draft Sennecke even if Lindstrom & Iginla are still on the board, how would you react to that?
Body mass or not, it's irrelevant. You can be 10/15 pounds lighter than somebody and still be miles stronger. I think any player that put the work to get stronger will get different results in term of mass gain but they will still be stronger and harder to play agaisnt regardless.The frame on said player is so key and it's discouraging how often it gets overlooked. It's like with Guhle and some folks saying.....hit the gym and throw on 15lbs. He just doesn't have the body type to do that over the course of a summer as it would drastically affect how he plays the game. Can he add weight/muscle, absolutely, but it will take some time.
And it was a massive failure. Teams need to make the right decisions for their club.
No hindsight, I'm blind and I called it last year... We better end with great players, if Michkov is an Elite player.
You always want players to be in great condition but that doesn't always transforms into being harder to play against. We've had 100+ years of data on that in hockey.Body mass or not, it's irrelevant. You can be 10/15 pounds lighter than somebody and still be miles stronger. I think any player that put the work to get stronger will get different results in term of mass gain but they will still be stronger and harder to play agaisnt regardless.
No he wouldn’t have been. This is just BS. The Leonard you are seeing today is not the Leonard we saw in his draft year.Leonard is more skilled and significantly better defensively.
He'd be in the running for 2nd overall this draft.
Sennecke has raised his game a notch in the playoff and has shown significant progress throughout the year.I seem to have missed the Sennecke hype-train. Where is it coming from? No mockdraft has him in the top 15. So I assume someone started this hype. Who?
Yeah I'd take Matthews over that bum Patrick Kane any day for the playoffsThey will not be available at 5. That's why their names doesn't show in the pool. Linstrom is my choice of the 2. Linsdrom is 2nd OA in my choice. I want players who fits for PO. Fancy scorers undersize, no thanks for me. I saw enough of Leafs losee in first round, if there is a lesson to learn.
I voted Iginla jr. He have the right size, the skating, the balance, the swag to make it happen in the nhl. He's not overly physical but physical enough. People here are crazy about Newhook who have zero physical in his game so what's the point if Tij is not overly physical. I know his father will be a good influence, jr will not fall into the trap of partying in Mtl, the city of chez Parée and vice. His father will guide him into this dangerous and big market of Mtl. We missed Tkachuk jr when we had a chance, lets not repeat the same mistake with Iginla jr. But I know they are built different and not playing the same style.
Which data do you have? What is the true benefit of that extra 10 pounds on hockey player other than simple physic mass+speed formula. I would like to know.You always want players to be in great condition but that doesn't always transforms into being harder to play against. We've had 100+ years of data on that in hockey.
And signing Karlsson played a part in that. That team is screwed fo quite some time moving forward. Crosby, Malkin, Letang, Karlsson, Rust, Rakell, Smith, Eller, Acciari...yikes.I think age was more of the problem, of the whole club
No he wouldn’t have been. This is just BS. The Leonard you are seeing today is not the Leonard we saw in his draft year.