White Sox in “serious” talks to build new stadium

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.
    • Our 2025 light and dark themes were lost, so we are rebuilding them. Light theme is currently available, but work in progress

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server

Kirk Van Houten

Registered User
May 7, 2019
1,108
1,268

The White Sox are negotiating with developer Related Midwest about the possibility of building a new ballpark on the South Loop parcel known as “the 78.” The Illinois Sports Facilities Authority, which owns and financed Guaranteed Rate Field, has not yet been involved in the discussions, according to the authority’s CEO Frank Bilecki. At some point, the stadium authority would need to get involved in determining the future of Guaranteed Rate Field and possibly in building a new ballpark, if it is publicly funded. The potential site at Roosevelt Road and Clark Street is owned by Related Midwest. Company president Curt Bailey refused to comment on the talks. So did Sox spokesperson Scott Reifert and Jason Lee, a senior adviser to Mayor Brandon Johnson.
 
Yeah, that is the primo spot for a new ballpark. Hopefully the city and especially state don't get roped in for too much public money.
 
GAF isn't hideous, it's just bland and there's nothing around it.
When they first built it, people complained, and has only reached mediocrity. It still ranks low in ballpark rankings, however, above the gruesome twosome that is Tropicana Field and Oakland County Coliseum.
 
New Comiskey (I dislike corporate names that change) just got caught in a terrible time period where there was no path to victory.

It didn't open to rave reviews because Old Comiskey was so tiny that every seat had a great view and everyone's reaction to the new place was "It's HUGE and we're so far away!" But it's really NOT huge compared to any other MLB stadium.

It's also "bland" because it was built when the focal point was THE GAME and not all the STUFF in a stadium, which drastically changed right after it opened.

Obviously, Oakland is terrible because it's 60+ years old and they've done virtually nothing but make it worse because of football; Not even doing what the Mets and Cardinals did making their cookie-cutter multipurpose stadiums Shea and Busch (I don't have a problem with corporate names that stay the same for 50 years**) more baseball home-y.

And the Rays stadium was designed in 1986 and opened in 1990 (ironically they were building it for the White Sox). It was outdated long before the Rays even moved in.


** Fun fact. Busch Stadium isn't named after the beer. The beer-baron owner of the Cardinals wanted to name the place Budweiser Stadium. The commissioner of baseball vetoed that. So he named it Busch Stadium after himself... and THEN launched Busch beer.
 
Last edited:
CTA: Red, Green, & Orange Lines all within a few blocks

Commuter Trains:
* Metra Rock Island Line (SW Burbs) runs right through the property. They'd likely add a stop, but closest station is 0.7mi

* Metra Electric Line (South Burbs w/ near SW burbs and South Chicago branches)
* South Shore (NW Indiana to South Bend)
These are both 0.7mi away from the Museum Campus/11th St. Station

(These are the current trains to GRF)

It's also 1.1mi from Union Station & 1.4mi from Ogilvie. A bit of a hike but they could potentially run CTA shuttle buses on gamedays, so it's accessible to the rest of the Metra lines.
 
Last edited:
Bears and Sox are both run by morons. The city, state, and county aren't going to remotely cough up the dough they're seeking. There is zero local or state appetite for a mega handout.
 
Bears and Sox are both run by morons. The city, state, and county aren't going to remotely cough up the dough they're seeking. There is zero local or state appetite for a mega handout.
Espcially the White Sox, considering there is another MLB team north that just paid to renovate their stadium privately.
 
Espcially the White Sox, considering there is another MLB team north that just paid to renovate their stadium privately.
Not like the Cubs didn't ask for state money. And overall, these are 2 very different scenarios.

The Cubs wanted to improve their ballpark in a well established neighborhood that they were beginning to buy up much of the property in. The Sox are looking to be the centerpiece of a new neighborhood, on land that very well may still be sitting empty in 50 years if the park doesn't get built.

I don't think the state should fund it, but offering some perspective of why they would. They need this land developed so it can enter the tax base and not continue to be a negative waste land.
 

Ad

Ad