Which Website Do You Consider More Reliable for Advanced Stats Natural Stat Trick or Moneypuck

[Bjornar Moxnes]

As everyone should be aware, moneypuck and NST are the most commonly used advanced stats for this community. Moneypuck being famous for their "Deserve to win'o'meter'". I'm curious which website people consider more reliably, as sometimes the xGF and xGA they track is vastly different.

 

[Artemi Panarin]

Not money puck

 

[Hisch13r]

I think MoneyPuck’s model is a pile of garbage. NST seems to line up more for me. I only use MoneyPuck if I want to quickly look at goalies because the layout is better and easier to use

 

[Pavel Buchnevich]

I think MoneyPuck’s model is a pile of garbage. NST seems to line up more for me. I only use MoneyPuck if I want to quickly look at goalies because the layout is better and easier to use

Yeah, this is it for me.

 

[dgibb10]

Evolving hockey.

But Moneypuck is good as a quick and dirty for a live game, and NST lets you look at linemates the easiest

 

[Golden_Jet]

NST, use moneypuck to look at lines