Which website do you consider more reliable for advanced stats, Natural Stat Trick or Moneypuck?

Bjornar Moxnes

Registered User
Oct 16, 2016
11,979
4,505
Troms og Finnmark
As everyone should be aware, moneypuck and NST are the most commonly used advanced stats for this community. Moneypuck being famous for their "Deserve to win'o'meter'". I'm curious which website people consider more reliably, as sometimes the xGF and xGA they track is vastly different.
 

Artemi Panarin

Registered User
Aug 3, 2021
1,461
3,560
Ко́ркино
Not money puck

277577.jpg
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
34,209
34,236
NJ
I think MoneyPuck’s model is a pile of garbage. NST seems to line up more for me. I only use MoneyPuck if I want to quickly look at goalies because the layout is better and easier to use
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad