viper0220
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2008
- 8,955
- 4,110
Reading the thread for this trade, opinions are all over the place, which team won this trade Philadelphia Flyers or the Anaheim Ducks
Ducks.
Nobody has better knowledge of the D's than Ducks so that's already a red flag to trade for him. Drysdale when healthy is a solid PP specialist though so maybe he can help the Flyers PP.
At the time Theodore had the bigger defensive struggles and it's not like they dumped him because they wanted to. They were in a bind and were going to lose someone. Vatanen was more established and they bet wrong that Montour would be the better player. As for Montour, he wasn't anything special until last season and so far this year he seems to have come back down to earth a bit with only 7 points in 24 games. Granted there may be some injury trouble there, I haven't been keeping tabs.Flyers for me. I'm a big fan of Drysdale and think he plays the more valuable position.
The same Ducks that let Theodore go to Vegas and traded away Montour.
They seem to know how to draft them but they haven't exactly made the best decisions with regards to which dmen to retain on their roster.
Something like this but I think given the circumstances this is a "both teams won the trade" situation.Ask again after Cutter's played at least one year of NHL hockey. Might have a better sense whether Drysdale really is injury prone or has been unlucky too.
Maybe. A lot depends on both guys. Conceptually speaking, if Gauthier can be a strong top line quality complement as a goal scorer, it's exactly what Anaheim's young core needs. If he struggles to adapt to the NHL or he gets out of dodge once Verbeek inevitably plays hardball with his first real contract, it's a loss for the Ducks unless they get good value if they have to trade him away.Something like this but I think given the circumstances this is a "both teams won the trade" situation.
At the time Theodore had the bigger defensive struggles and it's not like they dumped him because they wanted to. They were in a bind and were going to lose someone. Vatanen was more established and they bet wrong that Montour would be the better player. As for Montour, he wasn't anything special until last season and so far this year he seems to have come back down to earth a bit with only 7 points in 24 games. Granted there may be some injury trouble there, I haven't been keeping tabs.
Lindholm was traded as a rebuilding move and to allow Hampus to move on to a competitive team.
There's definitely question marks insofar as hoping Drysdale can meet his absolute ceiling and stay healthy. It's a good get for the Flyers but it isn't some critical loss for the Ducks. Mintyukov looks like he's tracking to be better than Drysdale overall if a slightly weaker skater. Luneau progressed really quickly before his injury and assuming the recovery isn't too dramatic he should at least be a solid second pair second PP puck mover with a decent defensive game. Zellweger is playing well in the AHL after the Gulls had a rough start and if all goes well with him he should be a strong skating puck moving defenseman that could be top pairing quality if all goes right in development.
The point is I think Anaheim is trading from a better position of positional strength here than when they moved Theodore and Montour. The only concern from me is how well Gauthier will adapt to the NHL and gel with Anaheim's roster.