Wallet Inspector
Registered User
- Jan 19, 2013
- 6,274
- 5,812
Personally I think I'd have him 3rd, with Roy at 2nd and Hasek at 1st.
Personally I think I'd have him 3rd, with Roy at 2nd and Hasek at 1st.
That top-3 is very hard to debate IMO
Back when they tracked save percentage on an abacus. It's near impossible to make these comparisons.Top 10...but like 8 or 9th
Plante, Dryden, Sawchuk, Hall and Parent all make it easy to debate
I have him more in a tier with guys like Brimsek or CuJo
So did Sean Avery.It may not be the most popular way to determine the greatest player in a sport but I always hold the players who break the game to the highest regard.
Brodeur forced the league to change its rules because he was too good at what he did. Hasek and Roy never got to that level.
Plante, Dryden, Sawchuk, Hall and Parent all make it easy to debate
How can you put a goalie who played in the 50s in your top 3? What’s your criteria?4th or 5th.
1. Hasek
2. Roy
3. Plante
I go back and forth between Hall and Brodeur for 4th.
How can you put a goalie who played in the 50s in your top 3? What’s your criteria?
The same as you rank any other player. You see what they did against their peers. That's all you can do.How can you put a goalie who played in the 50s in your top 3? What’s your criteria?
how bout 7 Vezinas and Hart on top of 6 Cups.How can you put a goalie who played in the 50s in your top 3? What’s your criteria?