Where do Malkin and Crosby's '09 Playoffs Rank All-Time? | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Where do Malkin and Crosby's '09 Playoffs Rank All-Time?

MastuhNinks

Registered User
Apr 30, 2011
6,203
7
The Iron Throne
I've always felt like how truly incredible the run these two players had in '09 gets forgotten, perhaps because it's their only championship thus far, I'm not really sure. The team around them certainly gets overrated, yes they made two straight Finals but if you look at the roster it really wasn't a good, or even average Cup winning team. Not very strong scoring depth, their 3rd leading scorer was a 38 year old Bill Guerin who had less than half the points Crosby or Malkin did. Average at best goaltending, and a below average defensive core. Malkin and Crosby dragged that team to victory in what's definitely the most impressive performance by a duo in the playoffs that I've seen in my lifetime. Sakic and Forsberg is obviously the prolific playoff duo for my generation, but their best playoff performances didn't really coincide as much to one dominant year.

Malkin and Crosby combined to score 67 points in 24 games, for a 2.79 points per game average (average goals per game per team in the '09 playoffs was 2.74). Their points to teams goal for % was 85% (67 points, the team scored 79 total in the playoffs).

The highest scoring duo Lemieux ever had was in '92 with Kevin Stevens, they combined for 62 points in 21 games (*Mario amazingly only played 15), for 2.95 points per game average (average goals per game per team in the '92 playoffs was 3.22). Their points to teams goals for % was 75% (62 points, the team scored 83 total goals). This Penguins duo is obviously at a disadvantage because they played fewer games, had much better scoring depth (Jagr and Francis) and Mario missed time. But it's hard to argue that they had a more dominant single playoffs for a duo than the '09 duo.

In 1972 Bobby Orr and Phil Esposito combined for 48 points in 15 games, for a 3.20 points per game average (average goals per game per team in the '72 playoffs was 3.01). Their points to team goals for % was 75% (48 points, the team scored 64 goals). Again, this duo is disadvantaged when you look at relative share of team scoring because they has much stronger depth than the '09 Penguins.

Wayne Gretzky + [choice of 80s HHOF Oiler] is the only duo I can see that actually scored more total points than the '09 duo, and he did it several times in '85 with Coffey and '88 with Messier. In 1985 Gretzky and Coffey combined for a ridiculous 84 points in 18 games, for a 4.67 points per game average (average goals per game per team in '85 playoffs was 3.74). Their points to team goals for % was 86% (84 points, the team scored 98 goals total). Impressive considering how many other great offensive players were on that team.


Anyways, that's just a small amount of number crunching, obviously raw numbers don't mean everything, and my perspective is very limited compared to many of the users here. I wouldn't even put that much stock into the 'points to team goals for %' stat, I was always just amazed at the 85% figure by the Penguins duo so I was curious as to what the stat was for others, but those guys played on much stronger teams (although that's not a bad argument in favour of the '09 duo). However, it certainly looks like the '09 playoff run by this duo had the perfect storm of high GP, weak supporting cast and prolific scoring to be one of the truly great performances by a duo in the playoffs in the history of the game.

I was merely looking at the highest scoring duos ever which obvious excludes a lot of great ones who played when the playoffs were much shorter, but it is pretty impressive that the only comparable duos since ~1970 include Bobby Orr, Mario Lemieux and Wayne Gretzky. Which is part of the reason why I'm posting here. I'm sure if I wanted to I could look up the most relatively dominant postseasons by Howe/Lindsay, Beliveau/Richard, etc. but the perspective I can get on performances by these players here exceeds the one I could get my simply scouring hockey-reference (whose usefulness drops the further back you want to go).

So yeah, what do the experts think of where this dominant duo playoff performance ranks all-time? I think that Esposito/Orr and Gretzky/Cofffey/Messier had the better single postseasons, but I'm actually confident in saying that the '09 playoffs was the best performance by a Penguins duo ever and the best period of the last quarter century. Surely if we got to see healthy prime Mario with healthy prime Jagr go on a Cup run that would change, but we never got that.

EDIT: Somehow in this long-winded post I failed to mention it, but I should specify that I'm talking about scoring duos specifically. That way we avoid the tricky argument of comparing, say, Crosby and Malkin in '09 to Sakic and Roy in 1996.

Also should note that I completely screwed up and skipped over Lemieux's 1991 playoffs with him and Recchi combining for 78 points in 24 games (or him and Stevens for 77 in 24). So um....Ignore all that stuff about the '09 duo definitely being the best in the past quarter century. Complete brain fart on my part.
 
Last edited:
It's the best since the 04-05 lockout by far IMO.

Malkin scored 36 points, with (a far past his prime) Ruslan Fedetenko, and Maxime Talbot on his wings. That should tell you all you need to know about how good he was in the '09 run. Malkin was great in that run, one of the best individual playoffs ever.

Crosby was great in the '09 run. He scored 31 points (his 15 goals the most by any player in the past 15 years) with a 38 year old slow as molasses Bill Guerin on his line, and Chris Kunitz who scored all of one goal. He did have a poor finals, but to be fair he was facing a peak Zetterberg (the best overall playoff performer of this generation IMO), and a prime Lidstrom nearly every shift.
 
Last edited:
I've said before that Malkin's 2009 is the most impressive individual playoff run I've seen since Sakic in 1996. And yes, it's tough to think of a time when two players on the same team had monster runs like Malkin and Crosby did in 2009. Perhaps Roy and Sakic in 2001? But in terms of "carrying their team," Roy and Sakic had more help from the Big 3 on defense than Crosby or Malkin ever did in 2009, plus Forsberg was big in the first round that year.
 
Jordan Staal & Matt Cooke were underrated defensive presences on that team.
 
I think it's extra impressive that they made the finals the year before and lost. Then came all the way back next year and won even after losing the first two games.
 
Obviously a much better team around them, but Lafleur and Lemaire in the '77 and '79 playoffs have to be in the conversation for best pairs in the playoffs. Combined for 45 pts in 14 games in '77; 46 in 16 in '79.
 
Obviously a much better team around them, but Lafleur and Lemaire in the '77 and '79 playoffs have to be in the conversation for best pairs in the playoffs. Combined for 45 pts in 14 games in '77; 46 in 16 in '79.

Yes, nice addition. However, I believe Crosby and Malkin played on different lines in the 09 playoffs except for pp minutes. Lafleur and Lemaire played together almost entirely except for maybe Lemaire taking the odd pk shift. Off the top of my head, you may have to go back to a Hull/Mikita playoff run to find two players on different lines that excelled to that degree in the playoffs. Or maybe Mahovlich/Cournoyer?
 
Looking back it stacks up really well as both guys doubled each every other player on the team both in the regular season and playoffs, other guys played their roles but the Pens won the SC that year by Malkin and Sid being great all year and playoffs long.

Who was the next best player or players on that team in that run and that pretty much answers your question on how great the pair were that year.
 
Interesting, so if you go by adjusted points the leading duos are:

1. Howe/Lindsay 1955 - 84 points
2. Gretzky/Coffey 1985 - 70 points
T3. Lemieux/Recchi 1991, Malkin/Crosby 2009 - 69 points


Granted I feel like the shorter two round playoffs Howe and Lindsay played in favour ridiculously huge number like that. It's one thing to play at that pace for 11 games, it's another to do it for 30.
 
Interesting, so if you go by adjusted points the leading duos are:

1. Howe/Lindsay 1955 - 84 points
2. Gretzky/Coffey 1985 - 70 points
T3. Lemieux/Recchi 1991, Malkin/Crosby 2009 - 69 points


Granted I feel like the shorter two round playoffs Howe and Lindsay played in favour ridiculously huge number like that. It's one thing to play at that pace for 11 games, it's another to do it for 30.

Yeah, I feel the 4 round playoff era can only be compared to itself.

Also, I'm not sure if he's adjusting to regular season or playoff scoring, but the 1950s is the only period in NHL history when overall scoring increased, rather than decreased in the playoffs, though I don't know how much of an affect it would have on the numbers used.

Whatever measure you use, Crosby/Malkin's 2009 was really historic
 
Overrated IMO. I know I'm in the minority, but I think Malkin was better than Sid, and Crosby's performance was upped by Patrick Kane and Jonathan Toews in 09-10 and on par with Kane in 12-13 (even though Kane scored less overall points). If I had to rank recent playoff performances, I'd go:

1. Malkin, 08-09
2. Kane, 09-10
3. Toews, 09-10
T4. Kane, 12-13 / Crosby, 08-09
 
Overrated IMO. I know I'm in the minority, but I think Malkin was better than Sid, and Crosby's performance was upped by Patrick Kane and Jonathan Toews in 09-10 and on par with Kane in 12-13 (even though Kane scored less overall points). If I had to rank recent playoff performances, I'd go:

1. Malkin, 08-09
2. Kane, 09-10
3. Toews, 09-10
T4. Kane, 12-13 / Crosby, 08-09
Patrick Kane putting up 28 points in 22 games, 3rd in the playoffs in scoring and a -2 is your 2nd best recent playoff performance? Seriously? Toews, Keith, Pronger and Briere were all better than Kane in that postseason IMO.
 
Patrick Kane putting up 28 points in 22 games, 3rd in the playoffs in scoring and a -2 is your 2nd best recent playoff performance? Seriously?

Kane was dynamite. Look at all the big goals, including GWG and Cup-clinching goals, Kane had during that run. That's why stats themselves are so grossly overrated without evaluating the impact of the performance. Sid was awesome against the Caps, like really awesome, I'll give him that. But Kane and Toews were overall better during their runs IMO. Malkin better than all of them.
 
Kane was dynamite. Look at all the big goals, including GWG and Cup-clinching goals, Kane had during that run. That's why stats themselves are so grossly overrated without evaluating the impact of the performance. Sid was awesome against the Caps, like really awesome, I'll give him that. But Kane and Toews were overall better during their runs IMO. Malkin better than all of them.
Patrick Kane's only GWG that year was the Cup-winning goal. Dustin Byfuglien was the one getting all the opportune goals that year.
 
Yes, nice addition. However, I believe Crosby and Malkin played on different lines in the 09 playoffs except for pp minutes. Lafleur and Lemaire played together almost entirely except for maybe Lemaire taking the odd pk shift. Off the top of my head, you may have to go back to a Hull/Mikita playoff run to find two players on different lines that excelled to that degree in the playoffs. Or maybe Mahovlich/Cournoyer?

Gretzky/Messier?
 
I've said before that Malkin's 2009 is the most impressive individual playoff run I've seen since Sakic in 1996. And yes, it's tough to think of a time when two players on the same team had monster runs like Malkin and Crosby did in 2009. Perhaps Roy and Sakic in 2001? But in terms of "carrying their team," Roy and Sakic had more help from the Big 3 on defense than Crosby or Malkin ever did in 2009, plus Forsberg was big in the first round that year.

Exactly what I thought even back in 2009. He had more points than Sakic in 1996 too. Malkin also scored some clutch goals that year. He just looked outright dominant almost effortless at times such as when he scored that ridiculous goal for a hat trick against Carolina. I don't think anyone else but Mario could honestly have scored that type of goal. You know the one: Malkin cutting around the net, looking to seemingly be going for a wraparound and then twisting on his backhand and putting the shot top shelf on Cam Ward. Incredible.

The knock on Malkin since, is that the Pens would likely have another Cup had he played better in the postseason since, which he hasn't. But 2009 was something else for him.

Just off the top of my head, since Sakic here are the Conn Smythe winners:
Vernon, Yzerman, Nieuwendyk, Stevens, Roy, Lidstrom, Giguere, Richards, Ward, Niedermayer, Zetterberg, (Malkin), Toews, Thomas, Quick, Kane, Williams.

Yeah, I'd pick him as the best since then personally. Toews, Richards and Thomas come to mind, but I still pick Malkin. Think about this, 3 players in NHL history have scored more in a single playoff than him. Gretzky, Coffey and Lemieux. That's it. Going back further, he is comparable to a lot of other great runs.

I think when you get to Leetch (1994), Lemieux (1991, 1992) and several in the 1980s is when you see some superior ones. But yeah, none as good as Sakic other than Malkins in my opinion and Sakic's is pretty parallel to Malkin in 2009.
 
The knock on Malkin since, is that the Pens would likely have another Cup had he played better in the postseason since, which he hasn't. But 2009 was something else for him.

Is there any other year than 09-10 where Malkin's playoffs performances were lesser than Crosby?.I think Crosby has to share half of the blame for their lack of success since their cup.
 
Is there any other year than 09-10 where Malkin's playoffs performances were lesser than Crosby?.I think Crosby has to share half of the blame for their lack of success since their cup.

The 07-08 run Malkin was not as good as Crosby, or Hossa for that matter. But yes they both should share blame for the lack of playoff success since '09
 
The 07-08 run Malkin was not as good as Crosby, or Hossa for that matter. But yes they both should share blame for the lack of playoff success since '09

I was only talking about post-cup seasons.In 07-08 the reason they didn't win is they were facing a better team, with a much more experienced and older leadership core (men vs boys).Datsyuk was 29, Zetterberg was 27, Lidstrom was 37 and the Norris winner, Rafalski was 34, even guys like Franzen, Cleary, Draper were 28, 29 and 36 respectively.Homlstrom was 35, so not too old yet.Kronwall was 27.
 
Last edited:
While Malkin scored a few more points, you also have to take into account that Crosby usually faced the tougher defensive players during that run. For instance, look at the final series - Zetterberg and Lidstrom was out there every shift against Crosby, while Malkin faced Filppula and Kronwall. That really opened up some space for Malkin. I also think that Crosby was more responsible defensively.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad