BraveCanadian
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2010
- 15,258
- 4,484
It's fairly easy to defend, as it is the single most credible list anyone has ever produced in hockey. Doesn't make it perfect or definitive but it has more credibility than anything that anyone criticizing it can produce. Even just his contentious top five, the knowledge of those players possessed by Bowman is something that people would kill for, and his ability to analyze the game is beyond that of anyone criticizing his list as well. His list doesn't fit the hfboards history section norm, but to 99.9% of people that is a problem with this section more than it is with Bowman.
Disagree.
And I doubt that Bowman actually puts as much thought and care into a list as some of the people do here tbh.