Maybe Nashville and NYI start discussions there, the rest easily turn it down. Pittsburgh and San Jose hang up laughing.
Completely disagree.
A generational talent goalie cant win a cup without a solid all around team in front of him. Hasek found that out the hard way for years in Buffalo.
A team can and has won a cup with a just OK goalie in net.
One thing every NHL cup winner has had is Norris caliber dman and/or a bona fide 1C. THOSE are the positions you cant do without
Nothing, as he realistically would not be available.
I believe Price will retire as a Montreal Canadian when his career is over.
But for ***** and giggles though, I'll make an EA NHL 2017 offer from the Flyers for Price.
To Philadelphia : G Carey Price and C David Desharnais
To Montreal : C Claude Giroux, LD Sam Morin, LW Taylor Leier, C Pascal Laberge, G Anthony Stolarz, a 1st round pick in 2018 and a 4th round pick in 2017.
Philadelphia would have to trade Mason or Neuvirth in a separate transaction after this fantasy trade was made.
Let's say one GM has gone mad and wants to trade the farm for Carey Price. what would he offer?
If Marc Bergevin is crazy enough to trade him what would be his demand?
You do know Price only has 2 years left on his deal. Would you give up Giroux+ for that. I dont like Philly(as a NYR fan) but thats a huge overpayment from you guys. Bishop is pretty much the same goalie just a a tiny step behind Price and he can be had for not much compared to Price.
Top 20 goalie
First line forward/defenseman
Top prospect
More like Montreal would never turn down Tavares+Hamonic for him.
Come back to reality, bud.
Roy 1993.
I think the correct answer is i have absolute no clue. Extremely hard to guess what it would take.
Also have to remember Price is an UFA after the 17/18 season. Is 29 and will get a huge contract.
If you go back to my post, you'll see I mentioned elite goal tending even if only for a brief period (ie the playoffs).
You can come up with teams that might have won with an average goalie, but I'd wager that goalie played the best of his career in that run. Hasek isn't a great example because he and the Sabres got hosed in 99. IMO, he should have won the Conn Smythe that year too.
I can come up with instances where average teams won on the back of elite goal tending.
Roy in 1986. That Habs team was far from elite. It was a hard working team with grit and some skill, and a mix of youth and vets. Roy stood on his head that Spring. Having lived my formative years through that period, I'd argue that the teams from 1987 through 1989 were more talented. They had better regular seasons, but Roy wasn't nearly as good and in some cases was down right bad. For a period there Moog completely had his number.
Roy in 1993. This one's a bit of an asterisk. That team was leading the Adams up to the last month of the season. The faltered down the stretch, and finished behind Boston and Quebec. Still, they finished with more than 100 points (in an 84 game season).
Murray in 2016. Murray stole a number of games for the Pens. After Kessel, he was the most pivotal player for the Pens imo.
The Kings got incredibly clutch play from Quick. The Hawks, more often than not, got great play from Crawford. There were some instances where they went to their back up briefly. Darling comes to mind. But, these deep teams, with multiple cups in the last 6 years, still needed elite play from their goalies to win.
Present day Montreal can go deep in the playoffs and have a 100 point season on the back of Price. Replace him with Ovi or Crosby and they might be a playoff team. They're not going deep though.
I wonder if he will take a home town discount. Watching him hit the market would be very entertaining.
The Roy examples are from a different era. And until you start to see mostly big name goaltenders winning the cup, you won't get GMs to give a lot for them in trades.If you go back to my post, you'll see I mentioned elite goal tending even if only for a brief period (ie the playoffs).
You can come up with teams that might have won with an average goalie, but I'd wager that goalie played the best of his career in that run. Hasek isn't a great example because he and the Sabres got hosed in 99. IMO, he should have won the Conn Smythe that year too.
I can come up with instances where average teams won on the back of elite goal tending.
Roy in 1986. That Habs team was far from elite. It was a hard working team with grit and some skill, and a mix of youth and vets. Roy stood on his head that Spring. Having lived my formative years through that period, I'd argue that the teams from 1987 through 1989 were more talented. They had better regular seasons, but Roy wasn't nearly as good and in some cases was down right bad. For a period there Moog completely had his number.
Roy in 1993. This one's a bit of an asterisk. That team was leading the Adams up to the last month of the season. The faltered down the stretch, and finished behind Boston and Quebec. Still, they finished with more than 100 points (in an 84 game season).
Murray in 2016. Murray stole a number of games for the Pens. After Kessel, he was the most pivotal player for the Pens imo.
The Kings got incredibly clutch play from Quick. The Hawks, more often than not, got great play from Crawford. There were some instances where they went to their back up briefly. Darling comes to mind. But, these deep teams, with multiple cups in the last 6 years, still needed elite play from their goalies to win.
Present day Montreal can go deep in the playoffs and have a 100 point season on the back of Price. Replace him with Ovi or Crosby and they might be a playoff team. They're not going deep though.
The Roy examples are from a different era. And until you start to see mostly big name goaltenders winning the cup, you won't get GMs to give a lot for them in trades.
This is a ridicolous discussion. No way in hell Habs will get close to Crosby,Mcdavid, Tavares etc for Price. Goalies dont have that kind of value. No way you would get some of the elite players. I would argue that Matt Murrays value is close to Price based on his age and cap hit etc.
Schneider got traded for what? 9th pick?
Make it the 5th in a good draft, Add a solid prospect and you might find som takers.
Edm fans offering Draisatl, puljujarvi+1st Are crazy and im not close to beeing en Edm fan. If Price was signed longterm at 6,5 sure he would cost more but the guy should get 9+ million when he signs a new deal and giving up so many assets and then breaking the bank when resigning him is a huge overpayment