What the is Goalie Interference

[FinlandPanther]

Yes this changed the game in a big way, no this isn’t the reason the Panthers lost. Goal on the ice that was taken away due to GI. Discuss. EDITED VIDEOS FOR CLARITY

 

[tarheelhockey]

What are you saying with that clip? Was that called a GI penalty?

 

[gojetsgo]

am I blind or does that clip not show anything?

 

[FinlandPanther]

What are you saying with that clip? Was that called a GI penalty?

It was a goal that was taken away due to GI

 

[CarolinaBlueJacket]

This has already been discussed thoroughly in an earlier thread about goalie interference. Scroll down the threads and read all the details.

 

[McRpro]

Premature stoppage on that clip.

 

[tarheelhockey]

It was a goal that was taken away due to GI

The clip doesn’t show any goal

 

[Ratsreign]

Yes this changed the game in a big way, no this isn’t the reason the Panthers lost. Goal on the ice that was taken away due to GI. Discuss.

This clip ends before the puck comes through

I liked the OP on the other thread about this better, anyway

 

[CarolinaBlueJacket]

Apparently there is a lot of drinking going on tonight

 

[ijuka]

Yes this changed the game in a big way, no this isn’t the reason the Panthers lost. Goal on the ice that was taken away due to GI. Discuss.

Good job giving a clip that doesn't show the GI while expecting us to then discuss the GI.

 

[CarolinaBlueJacket]

Good job giving a clip that doesn't show the GI while expecting us to then discuss the GI.

If you think this thread is bad, you should see the first one about this goal.

 

[Ratsreign]

Good job giving a clip that doesn't show the GI while expecting us to then discuss the GI.

Believe it or not, this clip pretty much shows the extent of the “interference”.

 

[Junohockeyfan]

I say NO GOAL! Based on what i saw in that clip.

 

[FinlandPanther]

Good job giving a clip that doesn't show the GI while expecting us to then discuss the GI.

It’s there now sassy boy.

 

[LEAFANFORLIFE23]

He's VERY clealy in the crease

 

[FinlandPanther]

He's VERY clealy in the crease

And very clearly pushed in there.

 

[Three On Zero]

This is goaltender interference:

Goaltender interference refers to any attacking player who, by means of their stick or body, interferes with or impedes the movements of the goaltender by actual physical contact. While incidental contact with the goaltender may occur, attacking players must make an effort to avoid contact in all circumstances.


Also that is 100% interference, the player made ZERO attempt to leave the crease and impeded the goalie from getting over to the puck.

 

[Craig Button]

Correct Call.

FLA made ZERO attempt to get the f out of there and not interfere with the goalie

 

[Ratsreign]

Correct Call.

FLA made ZERO attempt to get the f out of there and not interfere with the goalie

This is why they called it, even though the puck was past the goalie before he slid across into the Panther in the crease. He wasn’t stopping that anyway. But, I get why they still called it.

 

[FinlandPanther]

Correct Call.

FLA made ZERO attempt to get the f out of there and not interfere with the goalie

Yeah Rodrigues should barrel through Mahura to leave or just completely stop screening the goalie and go to open ice because can’t be anywhere near him even though he was forced in the crease. Amazing league if that’s how soft we’ve become.

 

[Craig Button]

Yeah Rodrigues should barrel through Mahura to leave or just completely stop screening the goalie and go to open ice because can’t be anywhere near him even though he was forced in the crease. Amazing league if that’s how soft we’ve become.

no.

he should just skate outside the crease and screen the goalie

Then the goal would be have been a good goal.

Better Luck Next Time

okay SEE YOU

 

[ItWasJustified]

FLA made ZERO attempt to get the f out of there and not interfere with the goalie

1. It's correct that he kind of parked in the crease, but he was still stopped from moving out by a Kraken defenseman.
2. He didn't interfere with the goalie UNTIL the puck was already passed him, so he didn't interfere with him during play.

 

[FinlandPanther]

no.

he should just skate outside the crease and screen the goalie

Then the goal would be have been a good goal.

Better Luck Next Time

okay SEE YOU

Like I said, the league has got soft. Ive seen a cup you haven’t. It is what it is. When someone forces you into the crease, you shouldn’t have to try and get out of the situation immediately. But leafs don’t go near the crease so I get the confusion.

 

[Craig Button]

1. It's correct that he kind of parked in the crease, but he was still stopped from moving out by a Kraken defenseman.
2. He didn't interfere with the goalie UNTIL the puck was already passed him, so he didn't interfere with him during play.

1. incorrect
2. incorrect

 

[Phil Kessels Hot Dog]

Looked like interference to me, he slashed the end of the goalies stick just before the shot