What is your most unpopular Rangers opinion?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

Fitzy

Very Stable Genius
Jan 29, 2009
36,368
24,174
I figured in the midst of trade rumors and a lengthy break it might be fun to discuss some of our more controversial or potentially unpopular Rangers- related opinions.

I've seen some good ones over the years on multiple boards- things like that Montoya was better than Lundqvist and just never got a fair shot, that it was a good thing the Rangers original trade for Lindros got nixed, ect.

I'll start with my own- Mike Richter was an extremely average NHL goaltender who was often outplayed by his own backup, and it would have been better if the Rangers had stuck with Cloutier instead.
 
This was an unpopular take at the time, but I think opinions have changed through the years: No, Torts did not hold back the offense in 2013, and we wouldn't have beaten Chicago had we made the finals that year.
 
Bad under a non-Torts system, or bad even under Torts.

Just mostly always bad in general but perceived as good in a time period where people had a poor understanding of what makes a good defenseman. They each had a couple of fine seasons when they first came up and then that was it.
 
if the Czech line was a 2ed line on the Rangers, they would have made the playoffs during those bad times
 
More unpopular takes:

-Rozsival was never as bad as many fans thought he was.
-Dubinsky should have been named an alternate captain after the 2010-11 season.
-Messier tarnished his legacy a little bit in his 2nd stint with the Rangers. I'll always appreciate him for 94, but his 2nd stint left a sour taste.
 
Interesting thread.

Conceptually, my (consistent) take is that points do not necessarily tell the ‘production’ story. For example, my favorite whipping boy Buchnevich may be a 20 goal/45 point player, but his decision making/intangibles/general disposition makes him a huge minus. He may be quite skilled, but the sum doesn’t equal the parts, and so you can declare his skill to be Top-6, but I’m certain his ‘loss’ would help the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Overcast
The Rangers should bring back the NEW YORK wordmark for the road jersey.

BzrJQ7WCUAAjjRo.jpg
 
More unpopular takes:

-Rozsival was never as bad as many fans thought he was.
-Dubinsky should have been named an alternate captain after the 2010-11 season.
-Messier tarnished his legacy a little bit in his 2nd stint with the Rangers. I'll always appreciate him for 94, but his 2nd stint left a sour taste.
None of these seem too unpopular to me *shrug*
 
Just mostly always bad in general but perceived as good in a time period where people had a poor understanding of what makes a good defenseman. They each had a couple of fine seasons when they first came up and then that was it.

That "time period" is now. Small, fast, right shot offensive d-men are in vogue I wonder how long that will last.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad