Doublerum1975
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2019
- 982
- 1,129
He scored 2 goals on crap goalie wouldn't get to excited yet but hopefully this gives him some confidence
Depth is good. Potential to be a top 6 forward.
Ppl forget Mik was our best forward outside the big four 2 years ago before the catastrophic injury.
Could provide the same, but, and I know the stats are not proving, Ritchie, I believe has more of an offensive upside then Clifford. But dollars and common sense, you may be right, it would be CliffordI'm wondering if Clifford could do the same and provide more
He’s Kulemin reincarnated without a doubtThis is true, but also a small blip in a bigger and bigger sample size. That said, if he wants to be here I wouldn't give up on a player with that kind of skating and size even if he doesn't have the best scoring touch.
I wouldn't be surprised if he had a modest 3 year peak like a Ponikarovsky or that one big Kulemin year.
Depth is good. Potential to be a top 6 forward.
Agree with that.I don't know about a potential top 6 forward, his career high in goals is 8.
But it is nice to see him bag a couple goals we need that
I don't know about a potential top 6 forward, his career high in goals is 8.
Well, he has 18 goals in 96 career games, with next to no PP time.
His career high in goals is still 8, that is not a top 6 forward.
That doesn't mean he can't be a useful player, he can be and he is.
But he is not a top 6 forward
what is a top 6 forward?