Yes I did say if it ain't broke don't fix it a few times, but that was never my primary argument. My primary reasoning was that we did not have another player on the team that could fill Hy... His role on that line.That argument sounds suspiciously like the one posters used when they wanted a certain winger removed from Matthews LW, I remember you being against fixing things that aren't broke then
That was you wasn't it?
Forgive me for having some doubts about somebody that's been back for plenty of time and still couldn't hit the ass end of a barn from 10 feet
Posters would say kapanen or whoever, but I maintained that he could not do what the fixture on that line did.
In this case mik should and could fill in and possibly surpass what engvall brings to the line.
All of miks skills match engvall and mik has, in the beginning, shown more offensive acumen than engvall.