666
Registered User
- Jun 27, 2005
- 3,306
- 1,064
sure, but, Mitch isnt a 20 goal 75 point player, he's more of a 25-70 95 point player, and that difference is HUGE, those these days, the salaries are catching up for the far lesser players. look at Hughes at $8/per for a whopping career high 31 points and 11 goals. I'd say Marner should earn 2.9/per more than Hughes. at Least Marner signed his deal after a 94 point season. ...geez, if Hughes had had 42 points he'd have commanded the same salary as Marner on a PPG average/$$ LOL
Interestingly Marner's last 17 games paces out to 29-67 96.